“Notably, O3-MINI, despite being one of the best reasoning models, frequently skipped essential proof steps by labeling them as “trivial”, even when their validity was crucial.”

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
24 points
*

read the study yourself

  • > ask the commenter if it’s a study or a self-interested blog post
  • > they don’t understand
  • > pull out illustrated diagram explaining that something hosted exclusively on the website of the for-profit business all authors are affiliated with is not the same as a peer-reviewed study published in a real venue
  • > they laugh and say “it’s a good study sir”
  • > click the link
  • > it’s a blog post
permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I wonder if they already made up terms like ‘bloggophobic’ or ‘peer review elitist’ in that ‘rightwinger tries to use leftwing language’ way.

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 2.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 757

    Posts

  • 19K

    Comments

Community moderators