Somehow this is the only country on earth where this seems to happen. When talking about shootings involving guns, okay, fine, the US is certainly an outlier there, but every country has cars and police.

This is murder.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
317 points

So some neckbeard republicans are going to come out and say “She should have just complied”, but honestly what is the absolute worst scinerio if she WAS shop-lifting? In what world is it not a better option to just get her FUCKING CAR’S license-plate number, track her to her house, then arrest her there when she’s clearly cornered? Or just boot her car when it’s found again and force her to come to you to get it off?

Because now you’ve killed a woman and her unborn baby over some God damn groceries.

permalink
report
reply
138 points

The headline “Pregnant lady caught shoplifting groceries; arrested” would already be telling of a society that has gone far over the edge.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

In this timeline, the edge is so far gone that it’s faded into myth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

I thought it was alcohol?

permalink
report
parent
reply
92 points

If this is a jurisdiction that says embryos are people then that cop executed a completely innocent person.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

Shhh… don’t point out their own hypocrisy

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

That would require logical consistency. I would never accuse a republican of such a thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

What I want to do is make a satirical video game about complying perfectly with a police officer’s requests, and show just how hard it is.

Throw in mixups where the player might be confronted by armed criminals, just to make sure players instill themselves with a sense of self-preservation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Okay but at that point shoot the tyres??

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

The argument will be that she was trying to use her car as a deadly weapon because she accelerated into an officer standing in front of the car.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Which falls apart when you watch the cops body cam footage and see that never even happened

permalink
report
parent
reply
-30 points

Unsurprisingly you have downvotes too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-33 points

Or, you could deal with the issue when and where it arises? Seriously, some of the commenters here are trying to rewrite history.

She drove at a police officer dude.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

She drove away from a police officer who intentionally stepped out in front of the car.

Also that’s some grade a level hypocrisy right there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-46 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

She should have complied for sure, but non-compliance shouldn’t mean execution by firing squad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Sorry, I’m just gonna repeat that for the folks in the back…

NONCOMPLIANCE SHOULDN’T MEAN EXECUTION BY FIRING SQUAD

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

I pretty sure she drove her car into a wall because she was bleeding to death. I don’t think that was really a decision.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Probably thought they were going to kill her anyway, since cops be doing that on the regular.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

she should have just complied,

I’m surprised there isn’t an automod bot to filter out cliche comments exactly like this

permalink
report
parent
reply
-56 points

Is nit that she shop lifted, is that she tried to run over the officer

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

If she was trying to run him over, she did a really shitty job. The cop put himself in front of the vehicle and she turned her steering wheel the wrong direction and didn’t slam the accelerator. I think if anything the cop was trying to be run over, not the other way around.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

Its not about “doing a good job” or not. She had the intent. Its all it takes for an officer or even a person to defend themselfs

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

“Yes, sir, officer sir! How many licks?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-35 points

How many items you took aithout paying?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

She clearly didn’t try to run him over though, so what’s it really about?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

She does not have to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

You can clearly see her turn the wheel away from the officer, and she doesn’t slam on the gas, she just accelerates at a normal speed. Not that that matters to you, you just love jacking off to pigs murdering people and don’t want to question for one second how shoplifting and resisting arrest is supposed to justify murder

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 22K

    Posts

  • 552K

    Comments