You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
53 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

Thank you

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

The problem with the RFA source is the CIA funding, not that it’s in English. It’s pretty disingenuous to try to imply Newizu is pro-Putin or anti-imperialist, or anti-west or anything else that would qualify as a separate bias or agenda.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

I don’t think they’re implying anything like that? A Russian source talking about a bad thing Russia did is generally more reliable than a CIA source saying the same thing, since there’s less incentive to make stuff up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

I read the previous comment. I tried to find a source they would prefer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I searched for her name and despite the RFE article being a week old, no other more credible outlets have picked up on it. Maybe other outlets are using a different romanization of her name but this is certainly a red flag.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

It literally isn’t. RFE is definitely a US propaganda platform, but it objectively has nothing to do with the CIA these days. But you should probably check under your bed one more time just to make sure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
78 points
*

RFE also “objectively” had nothing to do with the CIA for nearly 20 years after it was created, at which point it turned out the CIA had been funding it all along. But now we know they’ve stopped because they said they did, and anyone suggesting that they’re not editorially independent is a paranoid loon, just as they would’ve been in the 50’s and 60’s.

Some of us don’t believe that the people whose job it is to lie stopped lying because they said they did. Suggesting that the CIA is still doing things that they did regularly and successfully kept hidden in the past is not a conspiracy theory.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points
*

Preach! 🙌

permalink
report
parent
reply

RFE is definitely a US propaganda platform, but™️

That’s all you need to know. Scrap the whole source.

permalink
report
parent
reply

IDK it might be beneficial to know if it’s ANOTHER one of the 15 intelligence agencies the US operates…

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points
*

Why? What possible reason could you have to belive they just turned over a new leaf?

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

“The CIA said that they don’t have anything to do with Radio Free anymore so it must be true.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

The CIA routinely funds groups covertly. As is the case with RFE, we are often able to confirm this covert funding decades later.

A main purpose of the CIA is to obscure what groups the U.S. supports. Did they just stop doing their job one day?

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

sourced directly from the fertile fields of your ass

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Compared to Russian sources radio free liberty is a baron of truth and press accountability, so frankly it does not matter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

A shitty source not being the absolute worst source doesn’t make it any less shitty than it is. If your only options for news are US government propaganda or Russian government propaganda, the only valid choice is to stop following the news.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 5K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 120K

    Comments