I recommend this video to look more into OSR philosophy regarding the rules: https://www.youtube.com/live/bCxZ3TivVUM?si=aZ-y2U_AVjn9a6Ua

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-11 points

PF2S is bloated with unnecessary rules. If that’s your thing, and I totally get the appeal of having a “wait let’s just see what nethys says abou — Oh apparently there are mechanics for this drug” moment; personally I find it really gets in the way of the session. Rule and move on with the story. Keep the mechanics to what they need. We’re ultimately dealing with a pretty simple underlying system: d20 roll high. All the subterfuge and wordy mechanics don’t really change that at the end of the day you need to roll a d20 and generally do better than a 12 or so to do what you want.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I feel like pf2e has just enough rules to empower the players to the level I like

The more DM fiat a game has, the more trust I need from my players for things to go smoothly.

That’s not a bad thing, necessarily, but for me structure is usually good as long as it doesn’t raise the skill floor too high.

Once I’ve got trust built and feel a bit more experimental, I like Dungeon World or even Universalis

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Same I find it easy to gm and the players have enough of a grip of the system to be able to do something out of left field and I can find a way to make it work with the system so that play is smooth but consistent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

We’re ultimately dealing with a pretty simple underlying system: d20 roll high

I highly disagree with this sentiment. You do you, but this is not the general feeling of TTRPG players.

permalink
report
parent
reply

RPGMemes

!rpgmemes@ttrpg.network

Create post

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

Community stats

  • 2K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.3K

    Posts

  • 22K

    Comments