I use ad blockers and open source privacy focused software whenever I can but occasionally I have to use computers that don’t belong to me or an older phone where my usual applications aren’t installed and seeing all the advertisements just feels dirty and dystopian.

I think the worst ads are the text to speech ones that say “Download this app today”. The unblinking energenic people saying you can make a living at home are probably a close second.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
6 points

I don’t think that’s true at all.

If advertising didn’t exist then content producers and content consumers would embrace an alternative funding model because everyone wants content.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Enough to pay for it? Nope. I’ve been on the other sides of this equation, that is a very naive take.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Enough to pay for it … if it’s good enough to be worth paying for.

It’s that last part that kills most content creators. There’s people whose work I’ll idly browse as long as I don’t have to pay for it (even with ads: I love my ad blocker!). But you’re right, 99.44% of content creators whose work I idly look over would not get a single red cent out of me from direct payment.

So maybe it would be good to switch to payment-only schemes. That would kill off the crap creators and leave those behind who make something people think is worth paying for.

I mean … I still pay for books and music. I do pay for content. Just not shit content.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Enough to pay for it … if it’s good enough to be worth paying for.

I’ll give you an example. I use a site called lacemarket which is a buying/selling site for a niche hobby of Japanese street fashion. It will never be popular enough that enough people would be using the site in order for them to make enough to pay for hosting the site.

So they’re forced to run ad’s cause they have no other way to keep the site up. The owners are also not taking a percentage of people’s sales so they can continue to bring in people who want to use the site. But in order to not take money from the sellers, the only other option they have to keep the site running is ad funding.

It sucks but its too niche to do it any other way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You mean you’re a content producer that couldn’t get people to support you directly? Did ad revenue solve the problem?

If advertising didn’t exist other funding models would be embraced.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You just think that because advertising exists as an option. If that circumstance was different, everything else would be too.

permalink
report
parent
reply

[Outdated, please look at pinned post] Casual Conversation

!casualconversation@lemmy.world

Create post

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you’ll make some friends in the process.


RULES

  • Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling
  • Encourage conversation in your post
  • Avoid controversial topics such as politics or societal debates
  • Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate
  • No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc.
  • Respect privacy: Don’t ask for or share any personal information

Related discussion-focused communities

Community stats

  • 7

    Monthly active users

  • 482

    Posts

  • 13K

    Comments