like, it’s caffeine and water and brown, who cares. i drink diet soda so it’s no calories, no sugar. versus the stereotype starbucks order, why is soda so demonized

the whole sort of basically woo stuff about oh there’s antioxidants there which give you a 3% lower risk of skin cancer after the age of 65 like come on that doesn’t count

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
48 points

Because people aren’t pouring 30-40 grams of sugar into their coffee. Also artificial sweeteners taste like shit and haven’t been proven to not cause other health issues.

Drink water.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

Because people aren’t pouring 30-40 grams of sugar into their coffee.

I’ve seen people try. 🤢

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If you have a large coffee with oat milk (which has tons of sugar/carbs) and sugar, it’s pretty damn close to that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-28 points

Your reasoning is on level with religious people claiming that atheists have to prove that god doesn’t exist.

How do you prove that you are not a murderer?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Oh god dude you’d kill us so quick in the pharmaceutical industry.

EVERYTHING is trying to kill us, were lucky when something doesn’t - so assuming a chemical we randomly made that tastes like sugar doesn’t emulate it 100% isn’t unreasonable

(and what do you know, there even are links between aspartame in diet coke and cancer)

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*

The statement you think is supporting your belief is actually saying the opposite. WHO specifically does not claim that aspartame cause cancer.

However, what they did state is there was no reason to change the recommended acceptable daily intake level of 40 mg per kg of body weight per day .

Also, The FDA disagrees with IARC’s (what you refer to as WHO) conclusion that these studies support classifying aspartame as a possible carcinogen to humans. FDA scientists reviewed the scientific information included in IARC’s review in 2021 when it was first made available and identified significant shortcomings in the studies on which IARC relied. FDA also pointed out that JECF (also WHO) did not raise safety concerns for aspartame under the current levels of use and did not change the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI).

So yeah… Just believing journalists trying to click bait you is probably more likely to give you cancer than following the recommendation from WHO regarding daily intake of aspartame.

permalink
report
parent
reply

[Outdated, please look at pinned post] Casual Conversation

!casualconversation@lemmy.world

Create post

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you’ll make some friends in the process.


RULES

  • Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling
  • Encourage conversation in your post
  • Avoid controversial topics such as politics or societal debates
  • Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate
  • No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc.
  • Respect privacy: Don’t ask for or share any personal information

Related discussion-focused communities

Community stats

  • 5

    Monthly active users

  • 482

    Posts

  • 13K

    Comments