You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
7 points

It really does not show the US’s “strength” to brag so much about winning against someone with so much less resources.

It really does show the US’s strength when no country has nearly the same amount of resources.

“Everyone else being weaker than you does not show your strength” is a very odd take.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

With all that wealth plundered from the rest of the world they ought to perform better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

I’m not sure what you’re arguing.

Yes, the US has a large amount of wealth. That is what makes them strong.

they ought to perform better

So you’re saying they should be even stronger (than the strongest nation to ever exist)?

Or are you saying that “strength” is not about the total power one has, but about the efficiency with which one can convert resources into power?

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Where did they get all that wealth from?

Where did they get all that wealth from, motherfucker?

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*

There are different kinds of strength. One kind of strength is to be really good at colonizing and plundering the rest of the world. Another kind of strength is to be really good at dreaming of new horizons and using limited resources to reach them. America has more of the first kind of strength, the USSR had more of the second kind.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

This isn’t hard to understand. Either you’re very dense or just another debate pervert.

Probably both.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

I’m not sure what you’re arguing.

Do you not understand what plundering is?

Wealth extraction from the global south into the global north via american companies involved in resource extraction - minerals, gases, etc etc. Rights to said resources gained at the barrel of the gun of the US military itself or a coup instigated by the CIA.

For the love of god read a book about modern imperialism and how it works and save us from your international political illiteracy. https://resistir.info/livros/imperialism_john_smith.pdf

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

is a very odd take

So is being a liberal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Hexbears be like

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Another L for you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Politically illiterate dumbass posts a self-own.

This image depicts liberals and fascists being close to each other, while the far-left (hexbear) is far away from them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

I just see *removed externally hosted image*

here’s a link to the picture this person posted https://lemdro.id/pictrs/image/d6c8a45d-d579-48de-903b-6d7f5f885fe0.jpeg

maybe I’m daft but this picture makes no sense to me. So leftists are on the left, liberals are in the middle, and… I guess the point is that instead of continuing rightward it loops back around to liberal again? Are you mocking leftists for lumping liberals and conservatives together?

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Being tall isn’t impressive if you are on stilts

permalink
report
parent
reply

memes

!memes@hexbear.net

Create post

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net, it’s a great comm.

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we’ll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Community stats

  • 2K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.3K

    Posts

  • 29K

    Comments