Nebraska governor Jim Pillen, a Republican not noted as a women’s rights supporter, yesterday issued an executive order “defining” males and females and the attributes thereof. The anti-transgender political grandstanding offers fusty explanations of the sexes–men are “bigger, stronger and faster” on average–in pursuit of Rowling-esque calls for sexual segregation (and even echoing her ostensibly feminist rationales) and not a lot else.

The order declares that, in matters of the state, the “biological differences between the sexes are enduring” and that the “sex” of a person will be defined by the gender designated at birth. In addition to specifically noting how boy, girl, man, and woman will be defined, the order also includes biological descriptions. …

“It is common sense that men do not belong in women’s only spaces,” Pillen said in the news release. “As Governor, it is my duty to protect our kids and women’s athletics, which means providing single-sex spaces for women’s sports, bathrooms, and changing rooms.”

The reaction, at least from Democrats, is to point out that if it were enforced, the likely outcome would be Nebraska losing federal funding for womens’ shelters.

“Today Governor Pillen, famous women’s rights supporter, signed this offensive and ridiculous proclamation establishing a “Women’s Bill of Rights.” He should try saying this stuff to my face then we would see who’s got what biological advantage,” wrote State Senator Megan Hunt on Twitter.


You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
-8 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
27 points

I am, on average, bigger, faster, and stronger than a child.

All children are now women.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Some freak is going to use this as a legal defense now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It’s idiotic no matter how you look at it. Defending it in any regard is just as, if not more idiotic

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’m offended because it is so daft. If I had to define a man and a woman, I would say that it is currently difficult as there are two definitions, one being based on biological sex (which is itself a surprisingly ticklish concept) and the other based around gender and self identification. Personally, I’m happy with the latter. The former is useful in medical contexts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

By the way ; if you had to define woman and man, what would you say ?

Nobody has to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

But what does that mean, what’s the point of it? Both my daughters are above average height, probably about the height of the average man. Does that tell us anything useful?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

That’s the law of averages. They tell us nothing useful except what the average is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It tells us that your daughters will be better suited to get things off of the top shelf than others will be. But more likely to be uncomfortable when flying.

But other than that, no, nothing much useful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Not The Onion

!nottheonion@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome

We’re not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from…
  2. …credible sources, with…
  3. …their original headlines, that…
  4. …would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

Community stats

  • 7K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.1K

    Posts

  • 38K

    Comments

Community moderators