World’s first crewed liquid hydrogen plane takes off::undefined

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
-4 points

permalink
report
reply
-6 points


The space shuttle contain a huge reservoir of liquid hydrogen at very low temperature creating extremely difficult engineering stresses.
So, insurance cost will be sky high if ever such planes take commercial flights.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Well you know what else is explosive? Jet fuel!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Do you know how brittle metals become at very low temperature ? Did you notice I did not talk about hydrogen explosiveness ?

But sure, let’s now talk about explosiveness. Do you know the mixture ratio range is completely different (much greater) for air + H2 explosive mixture as compared to other mixtures ? You are very far from an expert on the topic aren’t you ?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

It also had 5 pressure vessels’ worth of liquid H2 for the fuel cells in the payload bay, sometimes more depending on the flight (and never had any issues wrt that, though of course it did present its own challenges). Challenger’s “failure mode” was in the SRB. The ET happened to be right next to it. We can talk about the ET and its direct impact on Columbia because the foam shedding was a problem with the ET. And of course, the issues with the NASA culture that were present for both.

I’m not going to wade into the semantics of explosive vs flammable argument further down because at the end of the day it’s semantics.

And I am an expert since you seem very intent on only experts partaking in this discussion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I agree the SRB was the start of the huge explosion that somehow involved liquid hydrogen. I was posting that example because I was replying to an example where it was gaseous hydrogen combustion and because for the plane in the post it is liquid hydrogen which is used.

I don’t mind talking to non-expert as long as they don’t believe they know what they don’t know and do not insist they know better when they don’t.

From your comment I don’t know what “ET” means but I suppose “SRB” is something like side booster rocket solid rocket booster (?) I am not an expert of the space shuttle so please tell me if it pleases you to do so.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I like how you just assume that we haven’t advanced technology or safety features at all since the 1930s.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It was a joke

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 557K

    Comments