You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
59 points

Have this guy’s video thumbnails always been this bad?

permalink
report
reply
64 points

he knows what the algorithm wants

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points
*

If they avoid the thumbnails out of principle, they lose a significant chunk of revenue.

It’s a small annoyance for a small number of viewers, and there are browser extensions you can get which fix clickbaity thumbnails. The clear choice is to do the thumbnails

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I guess. I only heard about him a year or so ago and it seemed like his thumbnails were more "normal"just that recently.

Click-baityness aside, it just reeks of vapid, shallow, content. I know you’re not supposed to judge a book by its cover, but if I see Fabio on the cover of a book, I know I’m in the wrong section so there’s some merit to it.

I’m not going to get my tech insight from someone who makes their content look like this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

It’s not the worst. I don’t have a problem with mkbhd’s thumbnails.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I have a genuine curiosity for what you think thumbnails should be? If not this, then what?

The thumbnail shows the product, shows the general reactions.

What else do you want?

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Personally I avoid videos with variations of the open mouth, confused face, and disappointed look these days. It’s just the area of YouTube I’ve gotten tired of, and those videos usually tend to be pretty shilly playing to the algorithm and tend to be from bigger channels. I understand why its done, but it doesn’t shield from criticism. Anyways good for them, but it has manifested in a way where because the algorithm is what dictates the product it feels like AI in a way where the presentation style gets tiring.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Fair enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Do we really need to have an exaggerated reaction in the thumbnail?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s barely a reaction in the first place.

I know the rest of YouTube is inundated with such thumbnails but this one in particular is very, very on point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

The thumbnail should be the frame closest to the middle of the video’s runtime, with no regard for context. I have an extension that does just that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

IMO, that defeats the purpose of the thumbnail.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

The almighty algorithm forces it. I don’t care as long as it’s not outright misleading

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

Honestly, when my favourite subscriptions post these thumbnails I don’t watch the video. I have one that has never done anything like this but posted their latest video with someone’s stupid shocked face on it. I won’t watch it and if they continue I’ll be unsubscribing.

I think this is just the grumpy old man coming out of me. I realise they are just trying to get more views. It’s just frustrating they got this popular without these thumbnails so why start now?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

That’s shit, you’re going to lose out on content you enjoy because the creators are trying to maximise their reach. If the content changed it’d be fair but just the marketing is no reason to do that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Corollary: when content creators start trying to maximize reach instead of relevance or quality, it’s time to stop watching them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

There’s an extension for de-clickbaiting thumbnails

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Yeah, you don’t get to his size without clickbaiting

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Mobile games don’t become as lucrative as it is without mtx. People understand the business reason, but it doesn’t mean it shields it from criticism. Doesn’t need defending either, since as you said money is enough to not care. You don’t really start doing that stuff if you care about perception, so I say good for them monetarily speaking. But, that’s the extent of my praise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

He’s just the classic YT clickbait content. Much better out there, smaller channels are where the quality content is, not these big cash farming ones.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yeah I was about to say: “This is an MKBHD video. Don’t click it.”

And yeah his thumbnails were always terrible. But to be fair, most were from a content perspective, too. Except the very very early ones. It’s a business, I get it. But it’s so weird how you can watch a 1 hour video and know nothing more than what you knew before. And that’s normal. You’ve been shown a lot of really pretty shots of a phone that make it look very beautiful, so clearly he or someone from his team is a great photographer. But there’s little else in the videos.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That’s been a youtube trend for a while now. Most 10-20 minute videos should not have been longer than 2-5 minutes. It caused me to massively reduce the time I spend on youtube - and for me to watch a video longer than 5 minutes from somebody I don’t know it needs to be about a very interesting topic and a description hinting at it not being just filler yet again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Humans love faces.

Our brains are wired in a way that makes us want to see faces everywhere. It’s why we experience pareidolia - seeing faces where none exist. Like on treebark, moon/mars surface pics, or the people who claim to see Jesus’ face on toast.

Thumbnail creators have found that just by putting a face on a thumbnail, people are much more likely to be interested.

Look also at film and TV covers. Pretty much all of them depict faces too. People are drawn to faces.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Having a face in the thumbnail isn’t the problem though. Having a useless arrow pointing to the thing that the video is obviously about coupled with the guy holding his head in his hands like he just caught his favorite phone in bed with another YouTuber is the problem.

I thought this guy was supposed to be well regarded.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

He is. He’s one of the most successful phone tech YouTubers. They do this because it’s what gets clicks. Doesn’t matter if you like it or hate it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Why do you guys give a shit about thumbnails? The titles and description are way more informative for me. I curse bad titles way more. And this is a good title.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-31 points

These “tech youtubers” are dumb AF. They keep feeding idiots anything if a brand pays them good money. They don’t understand evolving technology and their threats. Fucker kept going on about Facebook or something once. Just after facebook was accused of genocide in Myanmar.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Yet this video is very negative about the device, unless I’m missing something about your comment?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points
*

crypto bad. fb, google, tesla good

permalink
report
parent
reply

Android

!android@lemdro.id

Create post

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

🔗Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


💡Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it’s in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

💬Matrix Chat

💬Telegram channels / chats

📰Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it’s not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website’s name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don’t post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities
Lemmy App List
Chat and More

Community stats

  • 1.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.8K

    Posts

  • 34K

    Comments