Over three-fourths of Americans think there should be a maximum age limit for elected officials, according to a CBS News/YouGov survey.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
173 points

I’m 62, which is embarrassingly old to be effing around on the fediverse.

But I just want to say these octogenarians can’t possibly represent me.

It’s partly their age.

But to me wealth is the more corrupting factor. Some of these people have never had a real job, or at least in decades.

I’m both hoping to work until I’m 70 or die sooner.

These rich assholes can’t represent anyone except other rich assholes.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Early 50s and my back hurts…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I had some kind of random ten years’ of good health through my fifties. Then it all came to a stop like a train wreck – pneumonia, Covid, chemotherapy. And somehow I ended up type 2 diabetic.

Doh!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

5 years ago I was running triathlons…I’ve since slowed down a bit lol…

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

You will. I’ve got some years left. I will admit the move from Reddit was a bit perplexing.

But I’m learning. Sync and Thunder are interesting. Working out for me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I am in my thirties and see the decisions these people are making will ensure that I never get to “retire”. It partly their age but mostly their wealth, does Glitchy Mitch have to worry about money, fuck no. You be be sure that he is going to horde all the wealth he can and do his best to look like the Pale man from Pans Labyrinth

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I will never understand the people who have enough money for thirty lifetimes but not only keep working, but keep working a job that involves being a full time piece of shit.

I can understand people who love their jobs holding on, which makes me think they love being pieces of shit more than spending more time with their families and pursuing passion projects.

Most people under thirty are facing their “retirement” being two weeks of palliative care that wipes out their savings but there’s 80 year olds out there dragging their bodies out or bed each day to try and take even more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

You’re welcome here!

I agree, I’d rather see the wealth divestments, gift disclosures…

Maybe this age thing is actually a cop-out and is just a lead up to trying to change the voter age. I don’t support it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It seems like there are some ugly games played involving voter age. I don’t like it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Fediverse skews older than traditional social media from what I’ve seen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I think I finally realize why the news and politics communities are so popular here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

Yeah I’m realizing the fediverse feels so homey because it seems dominated by people old enough to remember the internet of the 90s, the ones that knew AOL was not the entire internet or even ‘web’ proper. We’re already acclimated to an internet where ‘discoverability’ took a little more elbow grease.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

What’s happening now does remind me of the early days of the net. I didn’t have 80 s access like darpa.

I first got Internet access in the early 90s at work.

There was this incredible sense of hope. And then the Nigerian prince scams and all that crap started happening.

It’s a great resource. But yes, elbow grease is not optional.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I actually had to read books to learn about computers and start using BBSs. Thankfully, my mom supported my reference manual habit 100% since we only traveled to a city that had a book store every few months.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I’m 62, which is embarrassingly old to be effing around on the fediverse.

stop talking shit about @FReddit@lemmy.world 😠

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I appreciate that.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 466K

    Comments