Yes it does.
There is literally nothing of substance behind the claims that “this one is different” it’s the exact same argument from the exact same unreliable sources. Literally the ONLY difference is that this vaccine was made controversal by American politics.
If you are against the covid vaccine then you are an anti-vaxxer, whether you realize it or not.
That’s not strictly true.
This was the first FDA-approved mRNA vaccine, so it is “different”.
Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine is the first mRNA product to achieve full FDA approval in the U.S.
You’re technically correct so I don’t understand the downvotes, you most obviously didn’t imply anything else. Love the mrna technology, went out of my way to get vaccinated during pregnancy (because Germany was a bit slow with that), literally worked on Covid, Anti-Covid meds and mRNA in the lab, and you’ll have my upvote. You’re the best kind of correct after all. Don’t get discouraged.
Technically correct, but that doesn’t mean it’s any less safe by all accounts.
https://www.vumc.org/viiii/infographics/how-does-mrna-vaccine-compare-traditional-vaccine
https://www.pfizer.com/news/articles/what_makes_an_rna_vaccine_different_from_a_conventional_vaccine
https://healthcare.utah.edu/coronavirus/vaccine/mrna-vaccine
I imagine you’re not actually against the Vaccine, just pointing out the factual truth that it is indeed different then prior vaccines, however that doesn’t on it’s own make it unsafe.
I never said (or even implied) it was less safe, only that saying it’s no different than previous vaccines is not true.
You’re putting words in my mouth
