You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-5 points
*

It’s directly deployed in stocks and real estate, what do you mean?

Most capital is “collectively owned” through public corporations, pension funds, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Not most, in the US around 400 individuals own over 50% of wealth. Similar situation in Russia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You’re right that wealth is concentrated, but I was saying that the assets are collectively owned. For example I am a shareholder of Amazon, a publicly-traded company that Jeff Bezos owns a large stake in. So Amazon is “collectively owned” but each share gets one vote instead of one person.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Shares only give you voting power if you have a massive amount of them. In the vast majority of cases shares function as either a place to store wealth to protect it from inflation or as speculative gambling, the majority of use cases is not to signify ownership. I would not classify that as collective ownership, maybe only in theory if you don’t look into it too much but real world application of shares is definitely not collective ownership.

I’m very much in favour of businesses being actually collectively owned through a coop business model though.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 8.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 264K

    Comments