From the book “Stalin” the seminal work of Historian Domenico Losurdo

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
0 points

Yeah have you ever lived in the USSR? Have you ever been to a post soviet country? Yeah…

permalink
report
parent
reply

post soviet

Damn, countries suck AFTER the socialist system was abandoned and everything was looted by liberal vultures???

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Reject causality, embrace liberal brainwashing

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yes I do wish I lived in the USSR at it’s prime.

Also it’s a bit rich to use the “muh post soviet poverty shit hole” line when it was the wests neoliberal economic shock doctrine that caused such a tragedy in the first place.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Yes because you have no idea… Which is fine, but then you should be less confident about your world views on isolated political systems full of self propaganda…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

you should be less confident about your world views on isolated political systems full of self propaganda…

Oh the irony.

permalink
report
parent
reply

No one here is being propagandized. You do not get Marxist propaganda defending the USSR in the west. Almost all of us grew up with the very opposite. The majority of us have had to spend our own time reading and learning. Sorry mate, but you are the one steeped in propaganda and I’d love for you to prove otherwise

permalink
report
parent
reply

Yes that’s true… I have no idea about the sheer trauma… Of having to share 1 communal toothbrush with the entire city… Or when Stalin took out his big spoon and ate literally 70% of everyone’s cheerios in one bite… Truly horrible…

permalink
report
parent
reply

The USSR took a backwater state that was still stuck in feudalism (meaning fucking serfdom) and within a single human generation sent the first person into space. They started from a way worse state than the west and made incredible achievements. They did this without the help of first world powers, and were even hindered by constant economic warfare to boot.

Yeah, you can visit ex Soviet states and see the degradation. Most of their failing infrastructure was built under Soviet planning and has since gone to rot. Economic liberalization has brought nothing to the table, and has obviously failed utterly at whatever promises we’re made initially.

None of what I’m saying is even debatable. The economic truths of the USSR are easily learned. YOU are a western chauvinist dipshit who looks at the achievements of actual socialism and without a single bit of historical material understanding spouts some ignorant bullshit. I’ll be clear: save your breath to instead talk about whatever authoritarian atrocities were supposedly dealt out. When you talk about the economic failures of the USSR you are treading on ahistorical bullshit that has no real ground.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Yeah sure, with all the licensed and stolen western tech. Mother russia couldn’t even mass produce a consumer automobile SOMEONE ELSE DESIGNED FOR THEM. This was the state of soviet manufacturing. Outdated western designs built in a that’ll do fashion.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Literally regurgitating nazi garbage, no exaggeration. Good job.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Which Western company was Sputnik and Soyuz licensed from?

permalink
report
parent
reply

MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If you look for it, you can find a video of children offering themselves up as prostitutes in post-Soviet collapse Russia. Please really stop and think about what would force someone to have to do that. When we think of some generic image of an Eastern Bloc, post-Soviet shithole, whatever your mental picture is wasn’t created by that nation. You’re thinking of a post-collapse nation. We have our own in America called the Rust Belt. We don’t blame the existence of ford and general motors as causing the dilapidation of Detroit. Their departure and subsequent economic collapse destroyed that region. It’s a similar story writ large all over the former Second World.

And sure, Soviet cars sucked. Fortunately most people didn’t need them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Yes because this is how geopolitics work. The USSR basically entirely in Europe. The living standards should be comparable to what europe was like. And not what africa was like. Or Mars.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

The living standards should be comparable to what europe was like. And not what africa was like. Or Mars.

I don’t think geographic location is as significant as a country’s, you know, history. Just because they were in Europe doesn’t mean that they were starting out on equal footing. If you compare the state of Russia under the tsar to somewhere like Britain or France, then it’s clear that the Soviets were starting from a disadvantage. Moreover, they were under constant economic and military threats from most of the developed world. In spite of all of that, they were able to develop quickly enough to defeat the Nazis and become a global superpower.

permalink
report
parent
reply