You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
29 points

Regular arrows should be infinite and special arrows limited. I like how they did it in BG3 actuallu

permalink
report
parent
reply

I haven’t played 5E on paper so I was actually wondering if that’s how the rules worked or not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Technically no. In reality, yes. Bows require arrows and most spells require a material component. These are never tracked unless it’s something special. If a spell costs thousands of gold in material components to cast, it should be required that you actually aquire that component, but otherwise pretty much everyone just assumes that you are prepared with a enough basic materials. The same for arrows and any other basic resources usually. I’ve never played with a party that tracks food and water, for example. It’s just assumed you’ve come prepared.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I hardly have players even using arrows in our 3.5 games, but I do definitely require the expensive material components (like I know there’s a spell that requires a ruby with 100gp or more). Most of them can be acquired easily enough that it doesn’t matter (such as sulphur + bat guano) but if it’s expensive/rare enough, I’m going to make sure you can actually get them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Normally you count them and get half of the shot ones back. It sucks. Thats why almost nobody does it.

permalink
report
parent
reply

RPGMemes

!rpgmemes@ttrpg.network

Create post

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

Community stats

  • 3.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.2K

    Posts

  • 20K

    Comments