You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
17 points

Tanking the economy will only hurt the majority, billionaires literally won’t notice

You’re talking about another recession where they can scoop up assets on the cheap and weather the storm while less fortunate people die. We’re talking about dismantling the system that makes that possible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

What does it mean to dismantle the system?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Asking for specifics, unable to grasp obvious concepts or being a sealion?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I dunno about him, but I’m asking for specifics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

It is a lot easier to tear down the hard work of others than to build something up yourself.

The UAW is not some benevolent non-profit out to help the poor people of America. They are an organization that represents less than .05% of Americans in one of the best paid low-skill jobs in America, and they say they are willing to try and tank the economy for the benefit of their members at the cost of everyone else.

They are in no way going to dismantle the system that has made them wealthier than their friends and neighbors. They are just holding out for a bigger package with more benefits, and are willing to play Russian Roulette with the economy to get it.

Even if all three CEOs gave up their salaries and benefits packages to benefit the UAW workers they would each only gain about $1 an hour based on my napkin math.

This Fain guy’s rhetoric is nothing more than that and it makes him and the union sound like an asshole to a neutral observer. Not that there are any neutral observers in this post.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

nothing but a bunch of pro-establishment and anti-union gaslighting nonsense

We’re done here, bootlicker.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Fuck right off with the ‘low-skill’ shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Am I wrong? I was using it as a comparison to jobs that require a similar amount of education and training.

I tried to check and it seemed to be categorized as “unskilled”. Didn’t really seem like a completely fair assessment so I used “low-skill” instead.

What would you call jobs in this category?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

How about if the three auto companies gave up 5% of their profits instead?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

I have no idea what sort of profit margins the auto companies are working on. I do think profit sharing is a pretty decent idea though. I am surprised the UAW isn’t asking for something like that. Maybe it is too unstable for wage workers in case of a recession.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Work Reform

!workreform@lemmy.world

Create post

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

  • All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
  • Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
  • Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
  • We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.

Our Goals

  • Higher wages for underpaid workers.
  • Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
  • Better and fewer working hours.
  • Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
  • Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.

Community stats

  • 3.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 946

    Posts

  • 17K

    Comments