I was forced to fill out an XFA form (that was pretending to be a PDF) from the Canadian government and the experience left me feeling completely subjugated. The lengths that Adobe go to to make sure that you have the most frustrating experience possible is unbelieveable. Searching for alternatives or help leads you to either: be forced to buy their premium software (or a licensed equivalent) or subscribe for Adobe’s online tools. Why is this propriety format allowed in government forms? What is so fantastic/irreplaceable about this format?

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
14 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Same with MacOS Preview, which normally handles everything PDF-related

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That just shows how dishonest Adobe is being. For example if a form was named “gov-form.xfa” instead of “gov-form.pdf” then my whole expectation would be different as it is obviously not a PDF and so I shouldn’t treat it as such.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Feels very hostile right? I assume that all these smart XFA forms still have an online legacy dumb equivalent that is far less easy to use (both for the user and the government)

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

To be honest it’s making my phishing senses go off. Javascript shouldn’t be in a PDF/XFA/whatever basically ever, but it’s why PDF is a potential malware risk

permalink
report
parent
reply

Free and Open Source Software

!foss@beehaw.org

Create post

If it’s free and open source and it’s also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 779

    Monthly active users

  • 792

    Posts

  • 10K

    Comments