Meta sparks privacy fears after unveiling $299 Smart Glasses with hidden cameras: ‘You can now film everyone without them knowing’::These stylish shades may look like a regular pair of Ray-Ban Wayfarers, but they’re actually Meta’s new Smart Glasses, complete with two tiny cameras and speakers implanted in the arms. The wearable tech was unveiled by Mark Zuckerberg Wednesday at the 2023 Meta Connect conference in Menlo Park, California, sparking a frenzy online.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
149 points
*

I remember when Google glasses came out, people got assaulted for wearing them

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/san-francisco-woman-says-she-was-attacked-for-wearing-google-glass/

Her Facebook post 💀

“OMG so you’ll never believe this but… I got verbally and physically assaulted and robbed last night in the city, had things thrown at me because of some ---- Google Glass haters,” Slocum posted to Facebook.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Boiled the frog too quickly

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
7 points

What will be the new name for Glassholes in the Meta era?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
76 points

Several bars in my city banned people wearing them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Venues will just need to implement infrared checks at the door.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

A simple solution would be to have a red led that displays when recording like video cameras

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

The trick is now you can’t tell. Should it be illegal? Heck yes. Will it? “Hmm … technology, so important … innovation… privacy is dead anyway …. terrorism prevention… “

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Why should be illegal!?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

How would banning these be enforceable though? They are only going to get more discreet, they will eventually appear completely indistinguishable from regular glasses.

There are certain ways to detect cameras, such as monitoring for infrared, but that would not work for all camera tech and could be hard to triangulate to exact people in crowded areas. There are also ways to detect electronic devices on a person but doing so could quickly become just as invasive in other ways.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Thermal cameras are surprisingly good at detecting things that use power. Defeat the camera with another camera 😉

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You don’t need the ban to be perfect. Especially if you go after manufacturers, not users. Make it harder for people to do uncouth things. Accessibility is a huge driver of people using things. You might not be able to stop everyone, but you can stop the majority of people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

IT’S FOR THE CHILDREN

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Why should it be illegal?

It’s perfectly legal to photograph strangers in public. You’re in public you have no reasonable expectation of privacy.

I don’t see people assaulting CCTV cameras for instance.

Sure some weirdos might I use it for nefarious reasons but if it didn’t exist they would still be weirdos using something else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

It’s perfectly legal to photograph strangers in public.

Depends on your legislation.

Here it’s the other way round.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Pretty sure there are at least some limitations to that. In a public toilet for instance…

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

People wear their glasses everywhere, including a variety of places where there is an expectation of privacy or where it is otherwise prohibited to record. Places where you would not be allowed to hold up your phone or camera and take photos.

The introduction of tech that makes it impossible to distinguish between someone minding their own business and someone recording you demands a change to the legal framework. It doesn’t make sense to hold to laws that were written for an entirely different scenario.

I don’t see people assaulting CCTV cameras for instance

I’ve seen that fairly often, particularly around political protests, and I’ve never seen a CCTV camera in a public bathroom, locker room, etc.

This tech is an inevitability and the potential legitimate uses are too valuable to ban it outright. But that doesn’t mean it should be treated exactly like a highly-visible camera or cell phone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Ok, now you and I are in a private place. Say, a bar. How do I know you’re not recording me?

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

Should it be illegal?

In the US, it’s been long held people do not have the “expectation of privacy” while out in public. One of the major issues that you’ve kinda touched on is how would it be enforced? So are you opposed to all forms of recording? Or is this more focused on a corporation potentially gathering data on people just by being in public where someone is wearing these?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

In the US, it’s been long held people do not have the “expectation of privacy” while out in public.

At the time it made sense. But laws need to change with the times. In the future you’ll have people wearing these shitty glasses with cameras all around you all day every day cataloging your movements and entering them into giant corporate data centers. Something needs to change.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Also in the US, there has been this bizarre expectation that “if it’s illegal, it will go away”, which is how we have this shitty War on (some) Drugs, “assault” “weapon” bans, and people thinking that we have to completely outlaw AI.

The tech is here. It’s going to be legal. We just have to figure out how to deal with it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I think we’re getting to the point where “expectation of privacy” and “expectation of not being uploaded” need to be separated.

I fully agree with the idea that there should be no expectation of privacy in public, but I also don’t think filming some random person and posting them online should be carte blanche allowed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Legally speaking, you pretty much consent to being recorded when you step outside your own private space as far as I know.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

IMO expectation of privacy is valid, but I believe people should also have the right to reasonably know if they’re being recorded. Recording people in public’s one thing if you have your phone out and are waving it around pointing it at people, but it’s a whole other thing if it’s a concealed or otherwise hidden recording device.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The problem is you won’t know you’re being recorded in private either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

I think some cameras will “pop out” on your screen if you take a picture of them, right?

What a shitty future ahead of us. “Why are you taking a picture of me?!” “Because you’re wearing some suspicious glasses and I want to make sure that you are not recording me. Yup. There they are.”

Edit: well, after seeing some pictures, you can still tell that the cameras are there. But you have to be looking for them, which is still shitty.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s only if it sends infrared signal (for example it has night vision). I don’t think anything will show up with these.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 551K

    Comments