You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
3 points

The people who should weigh the risks to Ukrainian civilians are Ukrainians themselves.

Minefields pose the same sort of risk to civilians, but I think it would be inappropriate to insist the Ukrainians can’t use mines to defend themselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The people who should weigh the risks to Ukrainian civilians are Ukrainians themselves.

mmm, no, i don’t think you can say this absolutely. if Pakistan is invaded by India tomorrow and they say they’re going to nuke Delhi in response i’m still going to be against that even though i’m not directly affected and they’d be in the right to do that, legally, politically, and militarily speaking. wars are not fought in a vacuum. additionally, what can be justified on the aforementioned three grounds does not inherently map to what is morally justified, and in this case i think there are obvious alternatives which can be taken that are much less morally dubious.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s not really the same thing.

If Ukrainians use cluster munitions, they are putting Ukrainian civilians at risk not Russian civilians. They are free to accept that risk for themselves. Particularly because Russian troops also pose significant risks to Ukrainian civilians.

I would oppose Ukrainian use of cluster munitions in Russia, for the same reason I would oppose use of Pakistani nuclear weapons in India.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

If Ukrainians use cluster munitions, they are putting Ukrainian civilians at risk not Russian civilians. They are free to accept that risk for themselves.

if you change the hypothetical to “Delhi rebels tomorrow against BJP rule and Narendra Modi says he’s going to nuke Delhi in response” i don’t think the arithmetic changes just because now the people are from the same country and that country is “free to accept that risk for itself” of what such an action will do. the usage is bad full stop; the consequences are avoidable through not using them; there are less morally dubious alternatives available which will have the same net outcome. these are valid arguments with or without borders being considered.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s like everyone forgot about post vietnam stories where kids were getting blown to bits just running around being kids.

The other talking point seems to be the failure rates of the cluster munitions, but left by the wayside is the fact that they can dismantle them and use the charge within to detonate mines.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Politics

!politics@beehaw.org

Create post

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it’s a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:
  • Where possible, post the original source of information.
    • If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
  • Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
  • Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
  • Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
  • Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 1.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.6K

    Posts

  • 12K

    Comments