Crops can blight, animals can get diseases. I don’t know much about hydroponics but I know that bacteria are a concern. What food source is the most reliable, the least likely to produce less food than expected?

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
4 points

It’s so inefficient you may as well just leave the population to starve, nearly the same effect for much less work!

permalink
report
parent
reply

You’re going to have people anyway, and they’re going to die. We just need a process to make their deaths a d resulting disposal as productive as possible. We could set an optimum age limit; maybe gameify the process, and package it with respect and nobility. We could give it a pleasant name - something like β€œCarousel” maybe.

We’re looking for balance, not a Buddhist sort of minimal impact.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Come on now Aldous, put your glasses on mate.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Asklemmy

!asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it’s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

Community stats

  • 7.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.5K

    Posts

  • 303K

    Comments