Lithium-ion is what the capitalists want you to use.

Nickel-hydrogen is three times heavier per unit of energy stored. Oh no. Sounds terrible. But it’s –

  • Cheap. $83 per kilowatt-hour (https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1809344115)

  • Lasts 20,000 cycles compared to 400-1200 for lithium-ion, so far fewer will have to be produced and disposed of.

  • Materials. This is the big one. Lithium is rare. It costs a lot of energy to mine, and mining produces a lot of wastewater and CIA coups. Nickel is abundant and cheaper, and causes less damage.

Nickely-hydrogen batteries are for applications where you want something good enough and care about the planet. Lithium-ion is when you need luxury and don’t care about externalities.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
1 point

Accounting for weight, does it otherwise last as long as lithium-ion batteries?

permalink
report
reply
3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

technology

!technology@hexbear.net

Create post

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

  • 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
  • 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
  • 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
  • 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
  • 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
  • 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
  • 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.

Community stats

  • 1.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.5K

    Posts

  • 19K

    Comments