You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
114 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points

Once we have super fast reliable internet we’ll likely have the whole computer as a service. We’ll just have access terminals basically and a subscription with a login, except for the nerds who want their own physical machine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
74 points

Bro just reinvented mainframes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

They’ve been reinvented repeatedly. Citrix, terminal servers, thin clients, cloud desktops, web apps, remote app delivery…

Most people (not necessarily here) need a web browser and an office program. Most people are well suited to terminals or something like a Chromebook.

I need actual hardware for my job and hobbies, but even I have a mini PC set up like a gaming console so that if I want to play games on my bedroom TV I don’t have to hook up my Steam Deck or gaming laptop. I just stream them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
4 points
*

& thin clients

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

No. Just no.

And get off my lawn, ya whippersnapper.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

RAM as a service can’t happen. It’s just far too slow. The whole computer can though. It’s RAM can be local so it can access it quickly, then it just needs to stream the video over, which is relatively simple if creating some amount of latency to deal with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Mhmm… Computer as a service. Why does that sound familiar…?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You have to hand it to the French though, that stuff was pretty dope.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Given how so many of us communicate, work, and compute using cloud platforms and services, we’re basically already there.

How many apps are basically just a dumb client using a REST API?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

you will own nothing and be happy!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Wait, we already had that in the 70s.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

You have to know that some dinosaur at ibm is screaming about how they gave up the centralized computer and is salivating over gigabit fiber so he can charge everyone 15 bucks a month to use an ibm mainframe.

Stadia almost didn’t suck, I bet we’re 10 years from phones just being hand terminals that tap into a local server and desktops won’t be far behind.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

sweaty gamers and nerds as always unite over having proper physical PCs rather than online services or consoles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Given the digital literacy of many “regular people” (e.g. my father, and seemingly every other of my friends), the idea is appealing. Especially, as most of them don’t care about privacy. Give them decent availability, and they will this money at you. And if you also give them support, I will, too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That’s exactly how it works right now with VDI. I’m using one at work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Honestly, cloud gaming is very good… when it is good. Sometime it suck. But when it’s good it’s incredible how much it feels like gaming locally.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Unsubscribe

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

It’ll never be fast enough. An SSD is orders of magnitude slower than RAM, which is orders of magnitude slower than cache. Internet speed is orders of magnitude slower than the slowest of hard drives, which is still way too slow to be used for anything that needs memory relatively soon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Need faster than light travel speeds and we can colocate it on the moon

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

A SATA SSD has ballpark 500MB/s, a 10g ethernet link 1250MB/s. Which means that it can indeed be faster to swap to the RAM of another box on the LAN that to your local SSD.

A Crucial P5 has a bit over 3GB/s but then there’s 25g ethernet. Let’s not speak of 400g direct attach.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
  • modern NVMe SSDs have much more bandwidth than that, on the order of > 3GiB/s.
  • even an antique SATA SSD from 2009 will probably have much lower access latency than sending commands to a remote device over an ethernet link and waiting for a response
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Bandwidth isn’t really most of the issue. It’s latency. It’s the amount of time from the CPU requesting a segment of memory to receiving it, which bandwidth doesn’t effect.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

You can do it today, just put your swapfile on sshfs and you’re done.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

So I could download more RAM?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Programmer Humor

!programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

Create post

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

  • Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
  • No NSFW content.
  • Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

Community stats

  • 5.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.5K

    Posts

  • 33K

    Comments