A Texas man accidentally shot a child while officiating a wedding in Lancaster County on Saturday, the sheriff’s office says.

Chief Deputy Ben Houchin said deputies were sent to a wedding at Hillside Events near Denton on a report of a gunshot wound.

Deputies learned that 62-year-old Michael Gardner, the wedding’s officiant, fired a gun to get everyone’s attention.

“He was going to fire in the air, and as he did that, it slipped and went off,” Houchin said.

The gun was loaded with a blank that Gardner made with gunpowder and glue.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-71 points

They truly aren’t, this is straight up lack of brain cells that’s the issue here

permalink
report
parent
reply
71 points
*

So we need to decide who gets guns then, right? Some kind of control?

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

You’d think the “don’t ban guns” people would be all for registration and background checks. After all, guns aren’t the problem, people are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points

I’m all for background checks, even mandatory safety classes, it’s the random banning of features that gets me. Banning firearms because they have a pistol grip or more than 10 round magazines makes no sense. The problem is most people who think like this get lumped in with the crazies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Your ideas are incredibly radical. We first must imagine the mindset of dead 200 year old wealthy men before we do such a thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Or send anyone over the age of 16 who you wouldn’t trust to be safe with a gun to reeducation camp until they get their shit together.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

Yeah 100% if you want to own a class of gun (say a revolver) you should have to take a class on that specific type of gun and pass a written and practical test, and renew this regularly. Want a different type of gun? Better go take that class and pass that test.

Rabid anti gun folks are just as bad as the rabid pro gun folks, but the regular ass folks in the middle all seem to agree that strong controls on who can purchase the dangerous tool is the most reasonable solution

But this is lemmy, basically Reddit but more intense. I fully expect the folks here to be rabid anti gun without any rationale arguments for that stance

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Your comment seems needlessly inflammatory, almost aggressive. I did not vote on it at all, but I would not be surprised if the downvotes you received were mostly because of that and not due to disagreement with your points.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Picture if he didn’t have a gun how this situation would have went.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

He could have shot the child with a bow and arrow :(

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

He probably would have used firecrackers or something. At least then it would have probably only have been his own fingers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points

Someone who makes their own blank and whips it out at a wedding near a child simply to get folks attention is so fucking dumb he’d find a way to hurt himself with his dinner fork

The issue isn’t the tool, it’s the retard wielding it

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Do you think he would have killed a child accidentally with a dinner fork?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

So he probably shouldn’t have a gun then…

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Someone who is living in a allegedly first world country who needs to carry a gun around is the issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It can be both

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The problem is that an idiot with no brain cells was allowed to have a gun.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Exactly

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The problem is that gun companies have convinced half the population of a country that owning a gun is a “God given right” which is a fucking weird concept to begin with lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Americans have an estimated 120 guns per 100 citizens, almost double that of the country with the second highest amount of firearms per capita.

Tell me again how that isn’t a problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

Do we have double the amount of murders per capita?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Gun deaths total, we come in at 9th place. (This is probably more correlated with poverty/wealth inequality though, which America also has in strides.)

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_firearm-related_death_rate

permalink
report
parent
reply
-19 points
*

It’s a tool. Blame the idiots that don’t use it correctly, not the tool itself

There are 908 motor vehicles per 1000 citizens in the US (source

In 2020, there were 5,250,837 vehicle collisions in America source

Tell me again how cars aren’t the problem.

Oh wait, that’s right, they are just a tool. The problem is people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Exactly, we should treating guns like cars. They should require revocable licenses, registration, training, and significant financial investment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

Tell me again how cars aren’t the problem.

You do realise cars actually require a license to operate? You literally already have “car control”.

So what exactly is your agrument again?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Ok, let’s treat guns like cars and require a training period and license to use one.

Though I would probably treat it more like a forklift, because a gun is a lot more immediately dangerous if you make a mistake than a car, like a forklift. With a car, you usually have to be doing something wrong for a while before you’ll kill anyone. With a gun you just accidentally pull the trigger when it’s pointed at someone and you probably just ended a life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

No, no, you’re right there. Cars are a problem too. But that’s a different topic, we’re talking guns now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Nice red herring. What does this have to do with the fact that there are TWICE as many guns per person in America than the next highest country? Doesn’t that tell you that maybe we have influenced too much gun culture in our society and made it too easy for people to obtain without proper vetting and safety regulations?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Most people that are pro gun aren’t against stricter gun control measures, the problem is we don’t live in society where we can tell who will do something dumb in the future. Blanket bans don’t help anyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No, it would be useless to ban blankets, everyone would be cold 🤓

But restrictions on carrying would make a lot more sense. They should not be carrying a weapon in a crowded area

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

I would rather cage stupid people than implement stricter gun control to be honest. I think that would go a hell of a lot farther in improving society.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The problem is that caging stupidity doesn’t prevent harm. What about the toddler who got shot? It would be far better to try to prevent the situation from happening in the first place

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

Copy pasted for like the 8th time in this god damn thread now

Yeah 100% if you want to own a class of gun (say a revolver) you should have to take a class on that specific type of gun and pass a written and practical test, and renew this regularly. Want a different type of gun? Better go take that class and pass that test.

Rabid anti gun folks are just as bad as the rabid pro gun folks, but the regular ass folks in the middle all seem to agree that strong controls on who can purchase the dangerous tool is the most reasonable solution

But this is lemmy, basically Reddit but more intense. I fully expect the folks here to be rabid anti gun without any rationale arguments for that stance

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Or maybe you’re getting downvoted because everyone is sick of you spamming the thread with your hot take and whining.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 21K

    Posts

  • 522K

    Comments