Why did this change? Was it a greed thing?

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
58 points

For longer videos, a lot of people will stop watching before the video ends. A lot of bandwidth is wasted by buffering the entire video when the user is only going to watch 50% of it. To save bandwidth, sites like YouTube only buffer a tiny bit at a time.

permalink
report
reply

I’m guilty of this. I’ll queue up long music mix or ambient videos and just leave them going.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’ll open dozens of 15-45min videos, watch a few to completion, close the rest after watching a tiny bit or nothing at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You should add them to a Playlist to save them for later

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

I meant something like opening a two hour long podcast and only listening to 30-60 minutes before closing the tab or switching to a different video. With the old functionality and current internet speeds, it likely would have buffered the entire video in only a few minutes. It could have wasted multiple GB of bandwidth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

IIRC YouTube breaks the videos up into chunks to achieve that

permalink
report
parent
reply

Antique Memes Roadshow

!antiquememesroadshow@lemmy.world

Create post

Giving you the backstory and appraisals of vintage memes!

Submissions should be vintage memes or commentary about vintage memes. Commenters are advised to appraise the internet value and provenance meme antiquities.

Rules:

  • Posts should be old memes or about old memes.
  • Don’t be a jerk. Be excellent to each other.
  • Keep it safe for work.
  • Follow global .world instance rules outlined here

Community stats

  • 1.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 576

    Posts

  • 3.2K

    Comments

Community moderators