Will this one-by-one system forever be our main thing or do you think we will break monogamy and maybe “team up” as groups or something?

And yeah polygamy is a thing but do you think it will catch on to “the upper class”?

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
28 points

It appears to be pretty stable through history and prehistory around the world, so it’s probably biological. Occasionally cultures allow limited exceptions but they’re usually one-sided. This lines up with my personal experience, which is that some people are capable of being poly, but most people just aren’t.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

With the amount of people who cheat, I would say most people are but not ethically.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Ah yes, that’s true. It’s pretty common among monogamous birds too.

As I understand it, they’re still mono because they couldn’t stand it if their partner was doing the same thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Man I have so many hopes for that nation. Big challenges, big potential.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That’s… not true? Monogamy was not the primary form of bonding through humanity’s history. It actually is only recently a global phenomenon, mostly due to European colonialism and the spread of Christianity.

You really need to show some data or sources to backup such a claim tbh. It contradicts most of anthropology of bonding and relationships.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Well, here’s the Wikipedia. To be clear, I’m counting a society where elite men might have multiple wives as still monogamous, since that’s not representative of an average member of the population and the wives themselves are still bound to a single partner. Maybe that’s a terminology error but for the sake of this question I think it’s clearest.

And yeah, as someone pointed out there’s an amount of infidelity in every human society, but it’s generally neither endorsed by the legitimate partner or society at large, at least not as an actual relationship.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

The wiki says out of ~1200 societies studied only ~180 were monogamous. And that 16% of the monogamous were not strictly monogamous. I don’t know why the wiki would help your case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You’re right, but is it noteworthy that societies with monogamy ultimately outcome teddit.hm others?

Not saying it’s “better” just now successful in an expansionist kind of way.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Asklemmy

!asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it’s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.3K

    Posts

  • 297K

    Comments