If people aren’t forced to work to live then how can I get cheap labor for my shitty business that my dad gave me?

Which we all know would happen IMMEDIATELY in lockstep with any widespread rollout of UBI, and any complaint would be met with half the country screeching “FREE MARKET REEEEEE”

Guess we better institute rent controls first then

That alone would be better than UBI.

Rent Control can only have one outcome. Decreased amount of available new or renovated rentals which coupled with an ever increasing demand for housing, creates some of the housing shortages we see in larger cities today.

UBI can be an effective way to fight poverty, and would be an even more effective way to combat poverty if we implemented a Negative Income tax whereby all welfare programs are rolled into the funding.

The maoist uprising against the landlords was the largest revolution in history and led to an almost entirely equitable distribution of land ownership

And how did that work out for the estimated 15-55 million people that died of starvation as a result of the “equitable distribution of land ownership”?

Source

More 👏 Empty 👏 Houses 👏 Than 👏 Homeless 👏 People 👏

Rent Control can only have one outcome. Decreased amount of available new or renovated rentals which coupled with an ever increasing demand for housing, creates some of the housing shortages we see in larger cities today.

Only if you assume that private landlords are the only way to supply housing.

There is no reason to assume that.

Shut up baby I know it

Too bad 80% of the country would call us commies for suggesting it.

If people have UBI, you can get away with paying less though. That’s how walmart does it; just encourage your workers to get welfare so they stay alive enough to work more

And that’s honestly my proposal for it. Basically, create something like UBI (my preference is NIT) that ensures everyone is over the poverty level, eliminate minimum wage, and have benefits phase out for some reasonable definition of “living wage” (say, 2x the poverty level, maybe 3x).

Working would never make you worse off, and people wouldn’t feel obligated to take crappy jobs if the pay isn’t there.

We could also eliminate many other forms of welfare at the same time and just increase benefits accordingly.

The only benefits that I think would have to stay, are those with “unlimited” downside, like healthcare.

UBI can potentially replace specific benefits for housing or general living expenses, but it can’t really replace healthcare.

I’d say some disability benefits as well. Simply getting by can be more expensive when you can’t do basic tasks yourself, even if you have the best universal health care possible.

Agreed, I certainly wouldn’t touch Medicare or Medicaid. I’d also probably leave unemployment insurance as is, and this would kick in afterward.

But I think it could replace Social Security, food assistance, housing assistance, etc. And I think we could fund it by lifting the income cap on Social Security, but I’d need to run the numbers to be sure.

News from around the world!

Rules:

Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

UBI Cash Payments Reduced Homelessness, Increased Employment in Denver(www.businessinsider.com)

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Rules:

Community stats

Community moderators