A lawsuit filed by more victims of the sex trafficking operation claims that Pornhub’s moderation staff ignored reports of their abuse videos.


Sixty-one additional women are suing Pornhub’s parent company, claiming that the company failed to take down videos of their abuse as part of the sex trafficking operation Girls Do Porn. They’re suing the company and its sites for sex trafficking, racketeering, conspiracy to commit racketeering, and human trafficking.

The complaint, filed on Tuesday, includes what it claims are internal emails obtained by the plaintiffs, represented by Holm Law Group, between Pornhub moderation staff. The emails allegedly show that Pornhub had only one moderator to review 700,000 potentially abusive videos, and that the company intentionally ignored repeated reports from victims in those videos.

The damages and restitution they seek amounts to more than $311,100,000. They demand a jury trial, and seek damages of $5 million per plaintiff, as well as restitution for all the money Aylo, the new name for Pornhub’s parent company, earned “marketing, selling and exploiting Plaintiffs’ videos in an amount that exceeds one hundred thousand dollars for each plaintiff.”

The plaintiffs are 61 more unnamed “Jane Doe” victims of Girls Do Porn, adding to the 60 that sued Pornhub in 2020 for similar claims.
Girls Do Porn was a federally-convicted sex trafficking ring that coerced young women into filming pornographic videos under the pretense of “modeling” gigs. In some cases, the women were violently abused. The operators told them that the videos would never appear online, so that their home communities wouldn’t find out, but they uploaded the footage to sites like Pornhub, where the videos went viral—and in many instances, destroyed their lives. Girls Do Porn was an official Pornhub content partner, with its videos frequently appearing on the front page, where they gathered millions of views.

read more: https://www.404media.co/girls-do-porn-victims-sue-pornhub-for-300-million/

archive: https://archive.ph/zQWt3#selection-593.0-609.599

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
83 points

I agree that pornhub, et al, should be liable for abuse their platform distributes, but how on earth is AI meant to help in sex trafficking?

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points

A lot of people have this very naive view that if we just build AI overlords to monitor all human activity, we can somehow automate good behavior and make the world a better place.

Really we’ll just end up with RoboCop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Roko’s Basilisk

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

That seems like an excellent idea, we should all make everything possible to make sure such AI overlords are built.

Please don’t hurt me, or an eventual future indistinguishable facsimile of myself…?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

But robocop was the good guy.

ED-209 was the bad guy.

He looked much cooler, but he was kind of a dick. And bad at stairs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

AI will help with sex trafficking by generating all the porn so humans won’t need to be involved at all.

In the future the equivalent lawsuit will be from the victims of hackers who used people’s PCs to generate porn.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

That’s like saying professional porn got rid of amateur / “real” sex porn. It didn’t.

There will always be a demand for real humans actually doing the thing depicted. While I’m sure there will be very popular AI production houses, similar to hentai, etc, if you think AI generated porn will completely remove the desire for humans from performing, then you do not understand why people watch porn.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
*

Edit: I said “ideally,” as in utopian. In practice, corporations, governments and overall greed are in the way.


Ideally, sci-fi style, an effective AI can sift through all the reports and take down the videos that are clearly suspicious (as opposed to popular and well-known videos of porn stars that could be found elsewhere, for example, in dvd format.) It could message the reporter asking for more information, for example. Then it could message an actual human for the videos it is not confident to deem as abusive.

It may even try to contact the victims and offer them options to report the perpetrators to the authorities. Or lead them to a safe house, etc.

It could do this without never being tired, never being hungry, never feeling shocked.

In practice, we’re not there yet. Close, but not there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Close? Pull the other one.

And that’s long before we get the ethical quandary of sourcing training data, and implicit biases.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Not a hot dog.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

True. I guess close was a bit of a stretch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

quite distopian, no thanks

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I know what you mean.

My scenario was ideal, from the point of view of my 80s kid self looking forward to a promising future.

That future is now, and I hate it, because governments and big corporations ruined it for all of us.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

This is why I can’t jive with idealists. They put forth a proposal because “ideally…” and get people to thinking “yeah he’s right,” but he conveniently left off the fact that due to human nature it is basically an impossible pipedream and you’re more likely to find true gnosis than for that to become reality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

The funny thing is that I’m a realist. But if course I like to think about what the supposed scenario is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

that’s for the bad guys to figure out in prison after being arrested

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s not magic.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 543K

    Comments