Because, while many people are unaware of it or have beard of it but donβt know what it does, itβs a novel, well-executed, reusable solution that is incredible at what it does. Otβs disruptive in the sense that I believe itβs changing how programs that need to parse code are written, and theyβll become faster to write, faster to execute, and better for it.
Not big-D disruptive, as in changing the face of computer science, but little-D, as in having a quiet but disproportionate impact on a lot of software.
Oh, I thought disruptive is a negative adjective. Translator translates it to my language as a negative adjective.
Your translator is right! The word does have negative connotations, in that the status quo is being disrupted. In the context of technology, it loses that connotation. It can mean something good, but not necessarily. Google was disruptive; was it for better, or worse? Tesla was too, but in the end, probably for the better. Iβd argue that e-bikes are disruptive in the US, as theyβre getting huge numbers of Americans who otherwise wouldnβt out of their cars for small trips.