You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-2 points

… The very first link you provided shows a chart that has more assistance going to corn than beef, more going to soy than dairy and more going to wheat then pigs.

https://agriculturefairnessalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/2020bdcat-1320x743.png

???

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

I think you should read more carefully what that chart is showing.

Corn for example is purple and gray mostly.

Purple = live stock feed gray = biodiesel

Soy is mostly purple, so most of it goes towards feeding live stock.

So most of the subsidiary is just being spent to make it cheaper to raise live stock.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Also grains are subsidized to support the beef industry because feeding beef beef byproduct had predictable results.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Just wanna point out that it’s “biodiesel and Industry” specifically because ethanol is added to almost all gas and more.

Ethanol is trashing engines and producing more waste via dead engines, all while providing jack shit for actual cleaner energy. The corn lobby landed ethanol requirements and it’s never going away now that they’ve found that revenue stream.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I don’t want to speak for them, but one can interpret crops subsidized for the purposes of livestock feed AS a subsidy for livestock. If you look at the sum of the purple sections (livestock and feed), it’s the largest.

But you are right: buddy’s own chart does show a larger direct subsidy for corn than direct subsidy for beef.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

You are correct, because barely any actually goes to corn we eat. Those subsidies exist just to make it cheaper to raise live stock. So while direct subsidies are higher for corn, it’s so high purely to help raise live stock. Just because we “can” eat corn doesn’t really impact the fact that we aren’t, it’s mostly live stock eating the corn the subsidies are paying for (And biofuel)

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yup, here in Iowa the vast, vast majority of corn is known as “cattle corn”, and as described it’s used for cattle (and biodiesel, and pigs). Most farmers only grow sweetcorn “for fun”, as a side thing compared to the huge subsidies for cattle corn.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Pigs and chickens don’t eat air, you know.

70% of US soy becomes animal feed. Some of the rest is used industrially, or becomes biodisel. Relatively little US soy becomes soy sauce, tofu, etc.

Soy subsidies, in practice, mostly function as a chicken and pork subsidy.

You’ll notice that we heavily subsidize animal feed crops like corn and soy, and spend much less money subsidizing fruits and veggies, nuts, and other legumes like black beans or lentils.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

70% of US soy becomes animal feed.

almost all soy is pressed for oil. the industrial waste from that process is the vast majority of what is fed to animals.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Soy subsidies, in practice, mostly function as a chicken and pork subsidy.

i think there’s a case to be made that it’s actually a corn subsidy more than chicken or pork.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 9.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 276K

    Comments