586

app rule(cdn.discordapp.com)

posted
by
Avatar
aranym@lemmy.name
in
Avatar
196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
42 comments
hidereport
Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
Avatar
IDatedSuccubi@lemmy.world
23 points

It’s Web 2.0 dummy, Web 3.0 is crypto and NFTs

permalink
report
reply
Avatar
Neato@kbin.social
19 points

So Web 1.0 was just the normal internet, created by users and companies.

Web 2.0 are the sites that try to consolidate and capture user-created content as their primary content. Link aggregation, art posts, etc.

Web 3.0 is the scam pushed by blockchain enthusiasts.

Will Web 4.0 be dubbed the AI web? Where anytime you use a search, browse a catalog or gallery or do almost anything else you interact through an AI?

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
gon@lemmy.world
17 points

Is Lemmy not also 3.0? It’s decentralized. Tho maybe because it’s still servers/hosting at the end of the day maybe not?

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
IDatedSuccubi@lemmy.world
14 points

I’m pretty sure the term Web 3.0 was created by cryptobros to promote their stuff

I don’t think Lemmy counts because you are still using the head server instead of being self-hosted

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
gon@lemmy.world
8 points

Eh ok, Web3 seems to be pretty hazy and loosely defined so I’m inclined to believe you’re right about it being just a buzzword basically.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Lexi Sneptaur@pawb.social
5 points

Lemmy is self hosted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Show more comments
Avatar
TeczowaLesba@lemmy.blahaj.zone
7 points

Web 3.0 is literally only a thing I’ve seen crypto people talk about. Decentralized infrastructure has been around for ages without that language, and the only projects I see using Web 3 language is crypto currency nonsense.

If anything, Web 3.0 seems allergic to actually decentralized infrastructure beyond telling people who lose money on crypto exchanges to run their own hardware wallet; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web3#Not_decentralised

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
kakes@sh.itjust.works
5 points

Imo “web 3.0” is a cool idea in theory, but never quite reached its potential. I posted this elsewhere, but imo the term should be generalized to include non-blockchain decentralization.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Show more comments
Avatar
MyFairJulia@lemmy.world
2 points
*

Proposal: Since Web 3.0 was once standing for decentralization and has been coopted by crypto, we should name our decentralized-only thing Web NT 3.0. You know, like New Technology. Like that spinoff Windows with a new kernel which eventually replaced the aging DOS kernel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
famousringo@sh.itjust.works
5 points

You’re right. They should’ve called apps web 3.0, but then the web guys might have to admit that a big reason why people flocked to apps is because of how much they’d already enshittified the web at that point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
crusa187@lemmy.ml
3 points

I thought 2.0 was defined by SaaS, and 3.0 IoT 🤷‍♂️

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
IDatedSuccubi@lemmy.world
2 points

I’m pretty sure those are separate parallel terms, like IoT can be in Web 2.0 (website connectivity) and Web 3.0 (blockchain interconnectivity some IT CEOs were pushing)

permalink
report
parent
reply

196

!196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

Create post

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

Other rules

Behavior rules:

  • No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
  • No genocide denial
  • No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
  • No namecalling
  • Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
  • Other things seen as cleary bad

Posting rules:

  • No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
  • No advertisements
  • No gore / violence
  • Mutual aid posts require verification from the mods first

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn’t adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196’s:

Community stats

  • 7.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 208K

    Comments

Community moderators