You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
2 points

Because they’re both doing it for the exact same reason. Netflix doesn’t want people using their service for free and neither does Youtube. Netflix didn’t have ads so they cracked down on accounts. Youtube does, so they’re cracking down on adblockers.

I was fine with Youtube locking their 4k+ resolutions behind premium but they’re slowly tightening their hand more and more to make it ‘profitable’. Hell, the queue feature is premium now. Using the app on your phone while it’s ‘locked’ is a premium feature. Things that should be free are being stuffed into the ‘premium’ package but because that wasn’t enough, they’re trying to block adblockers. Making people pay for what they were getting for free, while it makes sense from a business perspective, never goes over well. Premium is really only worth it if you want the people you watch it get paid more, everything else can be done by third party players.

Although like Reddit, they might kill those off next.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

“Should be free” ? You think only 4k videos cost them money? Bandwidth and storage for lower res is free? How naive jesus

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Lol yes because people are already developing third party apps with those same features for free, ya duncecap.

Also if Youtube made their site “pay to access” we’d watch it die within the month.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Nice logic, movies can also be downloaded for free via “third party”, does that mean studios should make them free because of that?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Crappy Design

!crappydesign@sh.itjust.works

Create post

Noticed that theres no equivalent to r/crappydesign here yet so i made one

Community stats

  • 117

    Monthly active users

  • 38

    Posts

  • 643

    Comments