I think calling their lack of preparation for something that hasn’t happened in 50 years suspicious is a stretch, regardless of whether or not there was an anniversary.
It’s not that it’s not happened in 50 years, it’s that it’s the anniversary of an event and it’s a big anniversary. Instead of a slightly raised security presence, it was markedly reduced. The US has heightened security every year on key holidays, and the US does’t have such an immediate threat right next door. Meanwhile Israel is generally more militaristic as a nation with mandatory service. The lack of defensive forces present on the day is just ludicrous.
it was markedly reduced
I personally haven’t seen any actual evidence that it was intentionally reduced for the anniversary specifically. That would be more suspicious if you can provide proof.
There have been plenty of sources that said forces had been moved away from Gaza to the West Bank. In fairness though there were some diversionary attacks by Hamas in the West Bank, also, but many of the gates that were breached seem to have been completely unguarded. Perhaps telling, there has been very little mention of casualties to Israeli defense forces, or even details about where they engaged with the insurgents during the initial attack.
