Scholastic found that it either had to give in to the hardliners who wanted to ban books for children or to not allow that, and they seem to have decided to give in.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
4 points

If the choices are to continue to sell these books at book fairs and to not sell them and they are now allowing schools to not sell them, it seems like they caved, correct?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Did you read their message?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Yes. It’s opt-in to receive the books tagged as controversial by them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s an option to receive books that legislators have declared illegal. They have no choice.

I get where you’re coming from. I agree with you that legislators are mostly stupid asses who should be tarred and feathered. I wouldn’t mind collecting them on an island saturated with their favorite spy tech and watch them do whatever they do with each other. It would be entertaining if they couldn’t harm the rest of us.

But I’ve also taught in public schools. If I worked in one of those states, I wouldn’t sponsor a book fair at all in the current climate. I don’t blame Schklastic for following the law. They didn’t cave. They’re simply making the hard choice to stay in business while they work to change the rules.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Banned Book Club

!bannedbooks@literature.cafe

Create post

Community dedicated to discussion of banned and challenged books.

ALA Advocacy Page

Banned Books Week

The Palace Project

Please follow this instances rules.

To find more communities on this instance, go to: !411@literature.cafe

Community stats

  • 8

    Monthly active users

  • 57

    Posts

  • 114

    Comments

Community moderators