You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
13 points
*

I feel like there might be interesting ways to deal with it. Perhaps the mass killing of neutrals only ever happened the first time, which could have been many generations ago and under singular circumstances. Since then, only the odd one here or there ever dies during the purge. Perhaps it’s been decades or centuries since anyone died to the purge, reinforcing belief in it’s effectiveness as a basis for a pure society. It may have been so long that people wonder whether the purge is even real, or just a traditional ceremony carried out annually based on old myths. Then one year, it wipes out half the city. The party investigates?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Followed by 3 quarters of the party dying to the ritual, most likely.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If they’re high enough level relative to the caster the spell doesn’t do insta-death, it just hurts a bit.

Otherwise the clerics would probably nuke themselves the first time they tried this. Maybe. The ethics of this spell are confusing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

The ritual could have been real, but was quietly faked so that a corrupt leader could avoid facing their fate.

Or, the ritual was always fake but used as a cover to assassinate specific targets without consequences.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Yes! And the ambiguity means the DM doesn’t have to decide which it is until the players have deduced certain facts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

whoever is casting that spell into a crowd of peasants will definitely turn evil

permalink
report
parent
reply

RPGMemes

!rpgmemes@ttrpg.network

Create post

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

Community stats

  • 2.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.3K

    Posts

  • 21K

    Comments