You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

more people the better yeah

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It ain’t that hard,

High density places:

lower parking availability, increase public transport availability and frequency.

Low density places:

They need their cars, they can keep them.

Remove zoning restrictions, and parking requirements

so there is more mixture of commercial and residential places shortening transport distance, allowing for even avoiding public transport and just walking/biking replacing this.

More biking infraestructure.

Fair taxes to car owners,

that means, othe people not having to support the huge car projects that cost more than they can get from the taxes they do on cars.

Also regulations on environmental design of cars, basically gaining back the progress we had done on car efficiency that was taken back by everyone wanting an SUV instead of a turismo.

:)

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

yea yea but you won’t answer to me mate, loss of time to talk with u :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Everyone walking or biking.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Realistically, EVs are useful as a stopgap solution. They could be used to cover the transition as we expand public transit like EV busses, trains, subways, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Really not a choice, carbon emissiosn have to stop. EVs dont do that. Urban trees are not going to revese climate change. Wow, you’re saying people need to keep lowering denisity.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 7.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 266K

    Comments