Image transcription: a section of a Wikipedia article titled “Relationship with Reality”. It reads “From a scientific viewpoint, elves are not considered objectively real. [3] However,” End transcription.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
2 points

I would counter that your pedantic hair splitting is what is truly edgy. “I don’t believe in god, but I don’t believe in not god” makes no semantic difference and is rather perfect fence sitting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Okay buddy, you’ve convinced me. Gnostic atheism is much more reasonable and true than agnostic atheism. Saying “I don’t know and don’t much care” is so much edgier than naming yourself “sin free for 0 days” and claiming to know for an absolute fact that there is no god

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

claiming to know for an absolute fact that there is no god

When it’s never been proved otherwise, it’s a weird hill to die on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That’s precisely what I’m saying. If you can’t prove that something is true, it’s weird to go to such lengths justifying an affirmative belief that it’s true, instead of taking the position that you simply don’t know and therefore don’t believe any claims made about it either way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply