You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
4 points

Excel is excellent at data analysis… Python integrations and everything

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

As an alternative, maybe just Python?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

Because every scientist is also a programmer?
Especially if they struggle to use Excel properly, no chance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’d be embarrassed to call myself a scientist if I didn’t know how to at least script basic shit and effortlessly reproduce data analyses. The bar for entry into every single stage of academic science is too fucking low. 95% of this literature is irreproducible shit, in part because fuckwits don’t know how to code. Scientists don’t need to be software engineers, but yes, they need to be able to program. It wasn’t this way 20 years ago, but it most certainly is nowadays.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Excel sucks open ass. At storing data, at displaying data, at analyzing data. Scientists, of all people, should understand how to use an RDBMS and a data processing framework like R.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I believe that accessibility is what makes Excel so good. And the world agrees.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 553K

    Comments