Before anything else, I would like to say that I admit systemd has brought great change to GNU/Linux. sysvinit wasn’t the best, and custom scripts for every distro is a pain I’d rather not have.

With that said, Poettering now works for Microsoft, systemd has basically taken over all of the common/popular distributions (if this is about the argument of “systemd making it easier for developers”, disclaimer: I don’t know. I’m not a developer), and this has led to a rampant monopolisation of the init system.

Memes aside, this has very real consequences. If you don’t want another CentOS-style “oof, sorry, off to testing” debacle happening with your init system, might want to look at the more “advanced” distributions that let you choose the init system.

I am well aware that systemd works well for the most part, and that gamers and most other people likely don’t care - which is fine, at least for now. I do expect to see a massive turnover in sentiment if something ever happens to systemd (not that I’d like for that to happen, but no trusting RedHat anymore), but I suppose we’ll get to it when we do.

My sentiments are well enunciated in this recent post on the Devuan forum: https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=5826

Cheers!

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
23 points

Ring me when systemd starts phoning home to Microsoft and/or installing random microsoft-related packages without my consent.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Whilst I don’t think that will happen anytime soon, I do not like how RedHat handled CentOS. With that said, I don’t think they are about to put their flagship init system on a testing-only OS (at this point), but I don’t know what they will come up with

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

To M$ maybe not, to RH… dunno.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Remember when Google’s DNS server address was hard-coded in systemd-resolved? Good times, what a laugh we all had.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Systemd-networkd (not systemd the init system) defaulted to the google DNS servers when:

  • the admin did not change the configuration
  • the user did not configure anything
  • the network did not announce anything
  • the packagers had not changed it as they were asked to do
  • the distribution actually decided to switch to networkd. Few have done somtomthis day.

That is indeed a serious issue worth bringing up decades later.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
*

The main thing that turned it into a serious issue rather than just a stupid thing to joke about was that Poettering refused (as of five years ago) to admit that it was a mistake.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Linux

!linux@lemmy.ml

Create post

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word “Linux” in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

  • Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
  • No misinformation
  • No NSFW content
  • No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

Community stats

  • 8.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.3K

    Posts

  • 173K

    Comments