That supposes to have a clear idea of what youâre going to code. Otherwise, itâs a lot of time wasted to constantly rewrite both the code and tests as you better understand how youâre going to solve the task while trying. I guess it works for very narrowed tasks rather than opened problems.
100%. TDD is just not practicably applicable to a lot of scenarios and I wish evangelists were clearer on that detail.
constantly rewrite both the code and tests as you better understand how youâre going to solve the task while trying
The tests should be decoupled from the âhowâ though. Itâs obviously not possible to completely decouple them, but if youâre âconstantlyâ rewriting, something is going wrong.
Brilliant talk on that topic (with slight audio problems): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZ05e7EMOLM
The only projects Iâve ever found interesting in my career was the stuff where nobody had any idea yet how the problem was going to be handled, and youâre right that starting with tests is not even possible in this scenario (prototyping is whatâs really important). Whenever Iâve written yet another text/email/calling/video Skype clone for yet another cable company, itâs possible to start with tests because you already know everything thatâs going into it.
TDD doesnât imply that you write all the tests first. It just mean you have to write a test before you write a line of production code.
The idea is to ask yourself âwhat is the first step I need, where am I going to begin?â. You then write a test that validate this first step and fail. Then you write the code to make it pass. Once your done with that, you ask yourself: "whatâs the next step? ". You, then, repeat the process for that step.
This is a process you are going to do anyway. Might as well take the time to write some test along with it.
That leads to focusing on the nitty gritty details first, building a library of thing you think you might need and you forget to think about the whole solution.
If you come up with another solution half way through, you will probably throw away half of the code you already built.
I see TDD as going depth first whereas I prefer to go breadth first. Try out a solution and skip the details (by mocking or assuming things). Once you have settled on the right solution you can fill in the details.
The tests help you discover what needs to be written, too. Honestly, I canât imagine starting to write code unless I have at least a rough concept of what to write.
Maybe Iâm being judgemental (I donât mean to be) but what I am trying to say is that, in my experience, writing tests as you code has usually lead to the best outcomes and often the fastest delivery times.