You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
17 points

I understand the sentiment, but Netflix having a monopoly on streaming content wasn’t a good situation, either.

permalink
report
reply
65 points

The ideal solution is multiple competing services with the same content.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Like music streaming services figured out years ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I’d recommend considering how the recently expired https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Paramount_Pictures,_Inc. would have applied to streaming services.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Yeah, the moment Netflix announced House of Cards, the US government should’ve hit them with this. Could’ve prevented this streaming mess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Does Walmart have a monopoly on kinder chocolate? The idea is to have several distributors each with as complete a catalog as possible. Having such a shattered offers between platforms makes it very noncompetitive against any piracy solution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

This right here dammit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

There is a difference between 1, 4 and 30 streaming services…

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The usurper delivered us from the evil that was cable or nothing.

You either die a hero or live long enough to become the enemy. The cycle must repeat

permalink
report
parent
reply

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

!piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Create post
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don’t request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don’t request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don’t submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others


Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.


Community stats

  • 5.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.1K

    Posts

  • 75K

    Comments