It’s like watching a clown show. Maybe he should watch more porn and grow up.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
115 points

That headline is… incredibly inaccurate. They’ve pledged to each other to avoid porn, and have software that throws an alarm (visible to each other) if they view it.

“Monitor Each Other’s Porn Intake” implies that they are seeking out porn and sharing it with each other, which is not what is happening here.

I think there are plenty of legitimate concerns here, but father and son sharing porn links is not one of them.

Also, I imagine young Mr. Johnson has at least 1 Android tablet or other burner device that is unknown to Dad.

permalink
report
reply
91 points
*

I mean when I read “monitoring each other’s porn intake” I assumed it meant “monitoring how much porn each other watches”. And considering who it was, I assumed that was for the sake of making sure that they didn’t watch any porn. I did not at any point think that they were sharing porn links with each other, because that’s generally not what monitoring someone’s intake means.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I assumed it meant they each keep tabs to make sure the other gets just enough porn each day but not too much.

Daaaaaaaaad you’ve exceeded your porn allowance for the day and it’s not even elevensies yet! 😠

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Now this is the quality sarcasm that has disappeared from Reddit! Stay witty, mon ami!

Edit: this is my high way of saying, “LOL.” 🤣

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Intake implies there is some consumption to begin with

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Not necessarily, it can also involve monitoring if there IS intake in the first place.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

“It sends a report to your accountability partner.

Depends on what is in that report. If it shows visited links. That would also make it pandering to a minor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
76 points

Right, because making your son your porn accountability buddy is an extremely normal and healthy thing to do.

How dare this article make it sound like such a healthy and normal thing is somehow extremely weird and creepy!?!

It’s not like he had his wife holding him accountable for not looking at naked bodies online. That would be disgusting. No, like any upstanding citizen he wisely decided that he’d have it alert his son if temptation ever became too much and he looked at porn.

If only he had a parenting guide so that we could all learn to run a household in ways that will definitely not result in all the kids needing therapy down the road.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Right, because making your son your porn accountability buddy is an extremely normal and healthy thing to do.

It absolutely is NOT, and that was one of the several problematic aspects of this that is not resolved by addressing the confusing language.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Pretty sure the above post is sarcasm?

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

No, what monitoring in this context means is to be made aware of each other’s porn INTAKE, or how much is being consumed and when, which the software is said to do. Nothing is suggesting they seek porn out to share content with each other, just that they are alerted when the other accesses porn.

I’d bet youre right about the alternative devices though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I wouldn’t be shocked to find there’s something to the jokes.

Sexually repressed conservatives usually have freaking weird kinks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah seriously just be into pain like the rest of us

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

In any other context, “monitoring intake” implies that the monitored party is consuming a quantity of the thing under discussion, and that the monitoring party is getting a report on what, when, and how much.

You wouldn’t say “monitoring food intake” about someone abstaining from food, or “monitoring alcohol intake” about someone maintaining sobriety. You’d probably say “fasting” or “avoiding alcohol”, or similar language. Such language should have been used here for clarity, IMO.

People on the thread are responding like they are reviewing each other’s porn, because the language encourages that misinterpretation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

“son, i’m going to be fasting from my big tiddy goth gf porn, care to help me out?”

Nope, still sounds fuckin weird my g

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I would say “monitoring food intake” means “making sure there isn’t too much”. One can infer through context that “too much” porn to conservative Christians would be “any” porn. Given the context of who the article is discussing, I did not assume they were sharing porn with each other. I have not seen any comments where this was assumed, as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I just looked into the app being used here, called “covenant eyes” and it seems your interpretation of the phrase is actually more correct, unfortunately that makes the headline even less misleading. You are indeed able to see and review exactly what content was accessed that set off the alert.

If you watch the “How it works” intro video on their site it seems they are literally monitoring and reviewing each other’s porn intake.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Nah, I didn’t read the headline thinking that they were sharing links with each other. It read to me like he and his son are holding each other accountable for how often they pleasure themselves with porn, and that’s incredibly fucking weird and inappropriate. While I think it’s generally a positive thing to be open and honest with your children, there is definitely a line. And this totally crosses that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah I was lucky enough to be raised by a sex positive mom. As a young child I called body parts by their names because they’re just body parts. Any questions I asked my mom got a truthful answer to the best of her knowledge and as appropriate as possible to my age. There was an understanding that if I was old enough to ask I was old enough to know. That was incredible for me. I have a healthy sex life in part because of this. I also don’t know anything about my mom’s sex life except for the time I found her copy of 50 shades, and the fact that my parents couldn’t stand each other for over a decade.

This is so much weirder and honestly depending on the son’s age it sounds like it could be adultification. A child shouldn’t be responsible for holding a parent accountable in general, but for this it’s just yikes

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

I feel like the reason they’d have to make a pledge like this in the first place is because one or both of them already got caught watching porn.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

The son is 17. If he’s not beating his meat regularly, something is wrong with him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Or asexual. But that seems unlikely in this scenario.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I think there are plenty of legitimate concerns here

Absolutely, Covenant Eyes is malware. Even worse, courts sometimes mandate it, eg in child custody cases. It’s commercialised spying from a business that has proven itselt not trustworthy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

100% this. it’s another arm of big religion. we have to defeat them

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Also, everyone is reading this as some kind of creepy weird sharing kinks thing. Guaranteed this is just overbearing parenting 101. Anyone raised in or around extreme Christian groups reads this for what it is: child monitoring software and forcing your values on your kid.

I am sure your 17 year old signed up, wholly voluntarily, to not look at porn. I’m sure this wasn’t pitched as, “I’ll even do it too, and set it up so you get alerts for me!” Right as they took away a near adult’s ability to explore his sexuality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Maybe you can explain how the headline isn’t 100000000% accurate instead of confirming it’s completely accurate

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Sounds like a security issue now that he’s speaker

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’d put money down that the kid set it up and has certain sites unlisted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Pretty sure they BOTH have a burning devices.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I did not interpret the headline that way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

No it’s not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

You could have just said “Mr. Johnson,” and “the other.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Mr. Johnson and Little Johnson?

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 23K

    Posts

  • 589K

    Comments