You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
80 points
*

Fuck a corporations but let’s not act like piracy is the modern version of Robin Hood or righting a huge injustice

permalink
report
reply
77 points
*

I mean yeah it’s selfish, but it is definitely righting a huge injustice:

There is literally no customer centric way to watch these shows, or most modern media at all. Where can I literally buy shows that I can then resell. Where can I get a subscription service that’s focused on giving me the best content possible and not trying to squeeze value out of me by influencing what I watch or selling my metrics or up selling me to a bigger plan after killing the previous plan or any number of other dark practices. Where can I buy DRM free offline files of these shows so I can watch them on an airplane on my own hardware without Internet?

It’s fucked up that there is literally no way for people to buy their entertainment and not be fucked over more for trying to do it the legal way and spending money. And piracy needs to exist as a breaking point to stop these companies from getting even worse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

If you are a gullible consumer whose devices are always connected to the internet, you don’t notice you’re getting a worse service. Unfortunately, way too many people are falling for this.

Luckily, at least PC gamers are largely outspoken about DRM and there are pretty popular platforms that cater to them. But console games and media (other than some e-books)? No end of DRM in sight.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

at least PC gamers are largely outspoken about DRM and there are pretty popular platforms that cater to them

I fear the day that’s no longer the case. Feels like gaming is becoming more “proprietary platform first” with every year.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Steam is full of DRM and people still worship Valve. If people actually gave a shit about DRM, they wouldn’t accept that bs. They would force publishers to release DRM-free games on GOG.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Hence why the people on the internet needs to reject people coming here to profit.

There’s no middle ground in trying to keep the internet good and having it be a platform to hock stuff.

We should go back to the roots. Promote collaboration and be hostile to those people trying to manufacture scarcity online

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I’m not against platforms, if they actually compete on features and not content.

This somewhat works for music. Spotify, Apple Music, Deezer, YT music all have pretty much the same catalog.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I get the spirit of that, but actual creators (not executives and investors) still need money. We can’t fully rid the internet of monetizable platforms without harming them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’ve been buying movies and series on Bluray, which I can rip and resell. Not every show has a physical release, but the most popular do and you do not have to watch every show there is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s not about percentages or watching everything. It’s about I want to watch what I want to watch, and usually that’s the opposite of the popular stuff.

Also let’s be real if we have to resort to going out physically to buy plastic disks that I’ll just immediately throw away after ripping, something is still drastically wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-23 points

No, it’s just stealing stuff. I’m a shameless pirate, but stop pretending that this is some noble resistance. The reality is that its a luxury someone is selling for a price, and we don’t want to pay the price, so we steal it. You could always just not consume it. That would be the noble move.

They’re assholes so I just don’t give a fuck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

It’s not stealing, it’s unauthorised redistribution. They don’t lose anything from piracy, except for potential customers, which is a pretty intangiable concept. Don’t think it’s even remotely as bad as going into a tech store and taking all their DVR’s, or even literal piracy by chasing down another boat with guns and taking their cargo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

sharing is literally not stealing

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

I’m not a proud pirate, but I’ll never be a proud data harvest free-for-all resource. there is no glamour to any of this, but I will patiently await a reasonable offering. in the music industry it also worked. as well as the video game industry. you can easily buy honest drm free games

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

New games are just annoying to pirate, old games and ROMs sure. Music I buy all the time but I also pirate all the time, every artist I buy music from and see live I probably first pirated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

I’d argue new AAA games are more annoying to buy.

The one modern-ish game I bought was Max Payne 3 and oh my god the fucking rockstar launcher. It needs to run in the background, it needs constant forced updates for nothing (i have very slow aussie internet) and it runs like shit. Not to mention the launcher bugged out and I lost my save half way through due to some cloud shit bug.

After buying like 300 games on steam It’s first game that triggered the thought, I actually regret buying this game through official channels. The paid experience is genuinely worse than the pirate copy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

It’s more like Civil Disobedience on account that Copyright is an entirelly artificial construct (the idea that you can’t copy - not take, just copy, with your own resources - something is pretty anti-natura, which is especially obvious in the more traditional domains like storytelling) and even the one reasonable rationalle for it - that it incentivises creation in a way that enriches society - has been entirelly nullified by making the entering of copyrighted works into the Public Domain take longer in average from the time of creation than the lifespan of the longuest living human ever: it mainly enriches a tiny fraction of people, not society as a whole, even though the costs of compliance are bourne by society as a whole.

It’s about not obbeying unfair laws in a way that doesn’t harm anybody and only damages the interests of those whose gain comes entirelly from the unfairness of said laws: so not selfless like a Robin Hood situation, but also not the pure selfishness of trying to get more than others.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

It kinda is though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

in a pretty limited, cultural archival and dissemination point of view, mayyyyyyyyybe.

the vast majority just want free entertainment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

No, they want easily accessible entertainment for a reasonable price.

Currently I’m supposed to pay 3-4 services at 10-15€ to get a somewhat reasonable library. There’s up to 60€, each month. For a collection of services, that I’m realistically using maybe 2h a day. That’s completely unreasonable.

And if you see, that especially Netflix seems to spend 90% of that money on extremely low quality crap, this price tag seems even less reasonable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Right now, I pirate mostly because I can’t afford paying for my entertainment (like the vast majority of people where I live). But even if I had disposable income, I would not pay for some media because I don’t want to spend money and be restricted more than if I didn’t. I would not mind spending money for DRM-less copies. And even if this wasn’t possible, I would rather pay for the piece and then pirate it DRM-less to truly own it (like I already did with some games when I was better-off).

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

There’s definitely people only looking for free content, but others like me pay a fair amount of money for the services needed to get going a Plex server, for example. I pay for a VPN to stream outside my network, I pay for JDownloader, a MediaFire account, a Plex subscription, etc…

It’s cheaper to just stick to Netflix and their horrible catalog and practices than to run my server the way I do, but it’s not just about the money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Sorta.

At a very narrow per-tree level it’s indeed about a selfish desire of the pirate.

At a broader forest-wide level it’s about the available choices having been artificially narrowed by legislation that creates a monopoly on copying. As seen more in the gaming world (mainly with GoG, Steam and indie titles) and even streaming video a few years ago, even with artificially narrow choices by law if the competition is still broad enough to provide lots of options at good prices, far fewer individuals will engage in Piracy, though as we see with streaming video, the artificial monopoly legislation ends up being sooner or later leveraged to narrow the available choices and Piracy flourishes in response.

It’s not by chance that the very same individuals who have simpletion takes on just about every subject (not saying you, just some commenters here) also seem have the simpleton “piracy is bad because the law says so” take when commenting on this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Hollywood put billions into the next generation disc, blu-ray, and you would still pay extra at Blockbuster for being late if it wasn’t for piracy.

While piracy isn’t without problem it is the closest we get to “supply and demand”. Piracy balances the scale.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

At some level it happens due to people wanting stuff for free… but if it’s the consequence of that is that works are preserved and disseminated, that’s more valuable for our culture than when companies vault them and lose them, or when they never release them at all, like Warner has been doing lately.

One might say that these companies have all the right to make these works unavailable, but this is clearly a situation where the “proper” is more detrimental than the “clandestine”. After all, the way these companies handle it, when the ridiculously excessive copyright length is over and the works are supposed to cease their artificial monopoly and be returned to the Public Domain from which everyone takes inspiration, there might be nothing left. A DVD is unlikely to last 100 years.

This is not a matter of life and death but culture has its value.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Most people don’t have the understanding to fully appreciate the consequences of the current system of “free” services. That’s why it’s the job of governments to put robust consumer protections in place. The Europeans have been making some moves in the right direction, lately. Unfortunately, they also increasingly have been veering towards totalitarianism in their moves to enforce mandatory trusted certificates, weakening of encryption and other hare-brained schemes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If by “free” services you mean ad-driven internet services, I don’t think this is as much a consequence of those, rather than the growing power of media companies and their influence over the law and technological development. They were fiercely against piracy since ever, their attempt to vilify VHS and cassete tapes comes to mind, but now copyright law is stricter than ever, digital ownership has been eroded into nearly non-existence through absurd one-sided License Agreements and devices increasingly act as if storefronts of the manufacturers rather than as a tools purchased by the customer.

This is not because there aren’t enough people paying, but because the media companies are never satisfied. Loads of people subscribed to streaming but it isn’t ever enough, it doesn’t guarantee that their quality and collections will remain as good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

Exactly. The bottom line is it’s still stealing. Do it all you want but don’t pretend you’re some hero, steal it with a smile on your face.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It’s illegal but not immoral, is the argument. Those two are a Venn diagram.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 543K

    Comments