1.2K

A simple solution at cost of minor aesthetic changes(feddit.de)

posted
by
Avatar
Oiconomia@feddit.de
in
Avatar
memes@lemmy.ml
304 comments
hidereport
Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
Avatar
R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
2 points

Minor cosmetic changes like running above ground power infrastructure where it doesn’t exist anymore?

permalink
report
reply
Avatar
tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
2 points

Its much easier and cheaper to install above ground than in the ground. Bonus points you could open it to Electrical trucks for emission free cargo in the city.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
can@sh.itjust.works
1 point
*

They do still in some places. It’s in my city, we have hybrid buses but we could use some of these.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
2 points

Not in all though, that’s the point. It’s not an easy transition and rail systems are more reliable for public transit in my opinion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
sergih123@eslemmy.es
2 points

Rail systems are not necessarily more reliable (at leats tram vs bus I mean), I do love the aesthetic of trams, and they are also more efficient due to the small rolling resistance.

And it is definitely easier to transition into trolley than it is to transition into tram.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 7.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 266K

    Comments

Community moderators