Lemdro.id

3 points

1 year ago

Then their companies will go belly-up.

report

[ - ]

Jeena@jemmy.jeena.net

8 points

1 year ago

I don’t believe it. If it’s good enough then they will ship and make money, and those who put people on it will be so slow that they will be just outperformed by those who don’t.

report

[ - ]

6 points

1 year ago

If your code doesn’t work because you rely entirely on an AI to do it, you don’t have a business you can run unless you want to go back to paper and pencil.

report

[ - ]

Jeena@jemmy.jeena.net

0 points

1 year ago

If your code doesn’t work because you rely on humans understanding it, you don’t have a business you can run. We already are there where humans have no idea why the computer does this or that decision because it’s so complex especially with all the machine learning and complex training data, etc. let’s not pretend it will get less complex with time.

report

[ - ]

3 points

1 year ago

So your argument is that people will rely on AI entirely without making any redundancies, unlike now where they have more than one human so they can check for these issues because humans make coding errors?

report

[ - ]

Jeena@jemmy.jeena.net

1 point

1 year ago

My argument is that already today no human is able to and checks it when it comes to decision making models like for example if the car should go left or right around a obstacle. And over time we will have less straight forward classical programming doing decisions and more and more models doing decisions with hundreds or thousands of sensor inputs.

report

[ - ]

3 points

1 year ago

And that means AI code shouldn’t be error-checked?

report

[ - ]

1 point

1 year ago

Except we already have fields (like pharma manufacturing) that have to deal with hundreds or thousands of inputs and variables, are automated, and we still manage to fully understand the stack as well as fully check everything.

Hint: when someone tells you they “can’t” check or understand what their software is doing, it’s a scam.

Normally they should be told to go back and figure it out before being allowed to ship any product. If you tried this in any other industry it would be laughable. Even in software it’s outrageous, imagine getting accounting software or even a simple file backup tool that doesn’t work some of the time and nobody can tell you how it works. Yet these companies get a pass putting cars like this on the road.

report

Show more comments

[ - ]

enkers@sh.itjust.works

1 point

1 year ago

I kinda agree with them. Currently coding already is an abstraction. The average developer has very little idea what machine code their compiler actually produces, and for the most part they don’t need to care about this. Feeding an AI a specification is just a higher level of abstraction.

For now, we’ll need people to check that AI produces code that does what we expect, but I believe at some point we’ll mostly take it for granted that they just do.

report

[ - ]

1 point

1 year ago

I’d hope so, but it already works for many of them

report