Comment by BruceTwarzen@kbin.social on TVs then vs TVs now

People now pretending that these box tvs were great is hilarious.

What was wrong with them? They served their purpose just fine for many years

The weighed a ton, they were limited in size, their resolution was terrible, they sucked down electricity…

Have you compared NES games on a CRT with the same games on a modern screen?

CRTs just look miles better.

CRT filters exist now, and with HDR output (or just sending an HDR-enable signal to get tv’s to use the full brightness range) and 4k displays it honestly as good at this point. or better because the only good CRT’s you can get now are pretty small P/BVM and my tv is much bigger than those

EDIT: OK, it’s ackchually not technically “resolution” per se, I get it. :p

That’s because the graphics were tailored to CRT ~~resolution~~ - which is to say, [things that just so happened to have] low/outright bad resolution.

CRTs have advantages over more modern stuff but that’s mostly about latency.

It’s not as much about resolution as it was about exploiting the quirks of CRT. Artists usually “squished” sprites horizontally (because crt screens would stretch them) and used the now famous “half dot” technique to have more subtle shading than what was actually possible at the pixel level. So if you just display the original sprites with no stretch and no “bleed” between pixels, it doesn’t look as good as it should.

I had never heard of this. Fascinating!

CRTs don’t have pixels so the resolution of the signal isn’t that important. It’s about the inherent softness you get from the technology. It’s better than any anti-aliasing we have today.

Crts were jagged and blurry. A misconverged pixel isn’t good anti aliasing.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missile_Command#/media/File%3AA5200_Missile_Command.png

CRTs do have pixels. If they didn’t, you could run an SVGA signal (800x600 at 60 Hz) directly into any CRT. If you tried this, it would likely damage the tube beyond repair.

The exact mechanism varied between manufacturers and types: http://filthypants.blogspot.com/2020/02/crt-shader-masks.html

I certainly saw aliasing problems on CRTs, though usually on computer monitors that had higher resolution and better connection standards. The image being inherently “soft” is related to limited resolution and shitty connections. SCART with RGB connections will bring out all the jagginess. The exact same display running on composite will soften it and make it go away, but at the cost of a lot of other things looking like shit.

CRTs themselve don’t have concept of resolution.

Maybe one’s before the 80s didn’t, but they almost all do after that. Exactly how this worked varied between manufacturers and the display type, but they tended to have some kind of mask that pushes it to a preferred resolution.

http://filthypants.blogspot.com/2020/02/crt-shader-masks.html

That’s because the graphics were tailored to CRT resolution - which is to say, low/outright bad resolution.

No, it’s because the graphics were tailored to the analog characteristics of CRTs: things like having scanlines instead of pixels and bleed between phosphors. If they were only tailored to low resolution they’d look good on a low resolution LCD, but they don’t.

I admit I’m quibbling, but the whole thread is that, so…

As a pedant, that is impressive work. Fair enough.

Compare a PS5 on a modern day large screen 4k TV vs a CRT of your favorite brand from any year.

If your only use case is playing old consoles, there’s filters for current emulators that fill that need adequately.

There are plenty of upscalers with minimal latency that fix that.

There also isn’t just “CRT” in this space. Professional video monitors give a very different picture than a consumer TV with only the RF converter input.

If one more under 25 retro fan tells me that RF tuners are the “true experience”, I’m going to drink myself to death with Malort.

Edit: please don’t tell me you believe CRTs have zero latency. Because that’s wrong, too.

Their screen was curved the wrong way until they released flat screen TVs

4:3 resolution meant you lost some of the content from movies or you watched them with black bars

Except movies keep changing so now if you want imax at home you need 4:3.

Whatever isn’t available at home is what movies will change to to keep themselves unique.

Widescreen has been the movie industry standard for how many decades now? IMAX is its own beast but most movies aren’t filmed in real IMAX resolution and now there’s digital IMAX which is basically 19:10 which is the same as many TVs…

Movies used to be all 4:3 before tv. It’s called the academy ratio. Movies now do 1.85:1 and even 2.39:1. A few even do anamorphic 2.76:1. Anything but the dominant home format.

4:3 resolution also means that a lot of good shows will never be watchable in the proper 16:9 format

No, it means 4:3 IS proper format

We had four channels and loved it!

And most people were lucky to have a TV. You were lucky to have a HOUSE! We used to live in one room, all hundred and twenty-six of us, no furniture. Half the floor was missing; we were all huddled together in one corner for fear of FALLING!

They were great until you had to move them. They were clunkier than a sofa because they had no place to hold and weighted as much as a refrigerator

They make a high pitched whine

Use better power supply

Is there a better power supply than cable + wall socket?

Better than the one soldered into the main circuit board of the TV?

If you got TV from crapufacturer, then yes.

Sony Trinitrons had whine to them, and those were basically the top consumer display back then. I think my JVC PVM has power supply whine.

Yes! Hire an electrical engineer to improve it for you, you pleb! \s

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

Are you serious?

Curved (the wrong way)
Massively heavy
Noise (just from the unit itself
Very low resolution
Noticably hot (might be a benefit in the winter)
Small picture, especially relative to weight
Depending how far back you go, no/shitty remote, only has 1 port for video

Very low resolution

For TVs, that’s just because they didn’t need any more resolution because the signal they were displaying was 480i (or even worse, in the case of things like really old computers/video game consoles).

My circa-2000 19" CRT computer monitor, on the other hand, could do a resolution that’s still higher than what most similarly-sized desktop flat screen monitors can manage (it was either QXGA [2048x1536] or QSXGA [2560x2048], I forget which).

And then, of course, there were specialized CRT displays like oscilloscopes and vector displays that actually drew with the electron beam and therefore had infinite “resolution.”

Point is, the low resolution was not an inherent limitation of CRT technology.

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

Sometimes I think about how some technologies could have evolved if they didn’t get out of fashion. I always thought it’s a bit unfair to compare products made decades ago with new ones and use it as a comparison for the whole technology.

In the case of crts, it would be totally possible to make them with modern aspect ratio and resolutions. The greatest challenges would probably be size, weight and power consumption.

They did break, You know? My father fixed those things, it’s that they were actually fixable back then and it was cool. Or maybe it was just russian tech that broke, we lived in one of those ussr sattellite countries.

Umm… How? There should be vacuum inside.

The vaccum craved A I R

Okay, so technically CRTs implode, but the result of the implosion can be an explosion. What happens with a CRT implosion is that the the glass gets sucked into the back of the tube with so much force it’ll bounce off the back of the tube and come out the front. So they kinda implode and explode. Combine that with the glass being leaded and there’s a reason you really shouldn’t go out smashing CRTs.

Stupid false nostalgia, just like the old c10 pickup trucks. They are rare now because they are SHIT and nearly all of them were scrapped like they deserve.

My ‘96, quarter-million-mile Ford fuckin’ Ranger is still running. I love it partly because it’s shit. It’s incredibly cheap, it hauls stuff, and I don’t have to care about it. Similarly, anybody coveting a C10 knows exactly what they’re getting into.

Also, I’ve still got a CRT TV in my back room and a couple of CRT monitors stored in the basement. I’m well aware that they’re not as good as my LCD TVs and monitors in every single way, except that they’re good for accurate retrogaming, so I keep them around for that purpose and that purpose only. (I’m also under no delusion of them lasting 50 years, contrary to the meme.)

My ‘96, quarter-million-mile Ford fuckin’ Ranger is still running.

FFR Member Checking in! 1993 SuperCab with the 4.0l V6 and twin sticks!

Mine also has a manual transmission and lever-operated 4x4 transfer case, but is a regular-cab 2.3L.

I picked it on purpose because I wanted the most efficient 4x4 truck I could find, but now (with kids and with towing/hauling more than commuting) I’d be better off with one like yours.

Yes, but… Counter point:

They are so god damn good looking.

Gotta put a lot of work and/or money into one to make it look that good, but point taken.

And god help you if you are even in a car accident

Moving those CRTs from one place to another is arduous.

The fear of having to walk under a mounted crt every time I went in and out of my room was real… 😂

Nostalgia is a powerful thing.

Do I think crt’s are better? No. Do I miss them? Yes.

Post memes here.

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.

An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.

Wait at least 2 months before reposting
No explicitly political content (about political figures, political events, elections and so on), !politicalmemes@lemmy.ca can be better place for that
Use NSFW marking accordingly

Laittakaa meemejä tänne.

Odota ainakin 2 kuukautta ennen meemin postaamista uudelleen
Ei selkeän poliittista sisältöä (poliitikoista, poliittisista tapahtumista, vaaleista jne) parempi paikka esim. !politicalmemes@lemmy.ca
Merkitse K18-sisältö tarpeen mukaan

TVs then vs TVs now(sopuli.xyz)

Memes

!memes@sopuli.xyz

Community stats

Community moderators