You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments

This whole anti-systemd thing is so pathetic.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

I understand it. I never liked windows moving to the database like registry for configs. But it is what it is type of thing. I might choose a distro because it still uses sysv and I already like freebsd so its a possibility for me to but I also like really easy and convenient distros I can install and go with. Generally im not really mucking about in those systems anyway except at a very high user level.

permalink
report
parent
reply

The thing coming closest to the Windows registry is Gnome’s GConf.

systemd also isn’t a monolithic blob. It would cause some work but you can individually replace the various systemd-related programs with own implementations. They all just communicate with each other, they’re not chained together.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Sorry I did not mean to say it was like the move to registry. More like I did not personally like and similarly am not wild about systemd myself. But ultimately it is with the flavors to decide what they are going to do and folks to use what they are gonna use. Again myself when it comes to install and go, im gonna use whatever works best for me and if thats distro with systemd then it is what it is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

“This whole anti-Microsoft thing is so pathetic. Just use Windows.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Angry old man angry that the world hasn’t remained exactly the same for his benefit alone.

you’re right, the article reads like a gigantic “GET OF MY LAWN!!”, I found it hilarious!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Angry old man angry

Damn, You weren’t kidding. the article would be comical if it weren’t so worrying for his mental state.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

What’s stopping anyone from maintaining the ONE PURE SYSTEM-FREE DISTRO ℱ?

Nothing, but actions have shown that distro maintainers overwhelmingly prefer systemd because it’s way easier to maintain than sysv init (from what I hear anyways). I’d put money on the author of the blog not being a distro maintainer - just some guy that complains on the internet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

There are plenty of Systemdless forks of distros. People do maintain and it works well. However, the issue is to make the forks its incredibly labor intensive for coders and while not impossible to remove systemd, it’s extremely hard. When base apps require systemd, it locks you down to that one system which is why people hate it so much. It centralizes code and the systems and prevents ease of choice. Does it work? Yes. Though even if it doesn’t affect you or your thoughts, its good to understand why there is a divide. I personally use Artix Linux at the moment with S6 as my init system and it works great. I get why people like Systemd, but I feel it sterilizes our freedom of choice like a frog in a pot of water.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Linux

!linux@lemmy.ml

Create post

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word “Linux” in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

  • Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
  • No misinformation
  • No NSFW content
  • No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by AlpĂĄr-Etele MĂ©der, licensed under CC BY 3.0

Community stats

  • 9.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.8K

    Posts

  • 162K

    Comments