You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
42 points

As a non American I can’t understand how anyone could vote for Donald twice.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

As a free-thinking human being, I can’t understand how anyone could vote for him once.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points

When you see his opponent it becomes easier to understand.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

No, it doesn’t. In any way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

As an American I can’t understand how anyone could vote for him once.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

As a Canadian, I can absolutely understand how someone less informed in politics and (rightfully) angry at the political establishment would vote for Trump in 2016 just to flip the bird to Hillary. Americans need to understand why he won to make sure it doesn’t happen again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I apparently have difficulty empathizing with people who aren’t paying attention to what they’re voting for (or against).

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

After seeing how the super delegates worked against Sanders, and how blatantly undemocratic our process of selecting candidates truly is, a lot of people fell into the trap of “fuck it, burn the world down then”. I know a lot of people reacted that way when the Republican party’s obvious rigging of the 2012 nomination worked against Ron Paul even though the votes were tallied in some states that he was the actual victor, but the derailment of his campaign by announcing Mitt Romney as the winner did enough damage…even though the Republican party chairs for several states had to resign due to the obvious false declarations and ignoring of the votes counted in primaries happened.

The real problem is the lack of confidence in our democracy and the rampant apathy that works against constructive progress.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Americans need to understand why he won to make sure it doesn’t happen again.

It’s been estimated that 13% of Trump’s voters were Obama voters. The degree to which this impacted his victory is debated, but this group is almost invisible in the way Trump is understood in the popular discourse, which is almost entirely determined by… Trump’s own spectacle of rhetoric and the feedback it generates. The degradation of civic institutions and disenfranchisement is a major factor, experiencing this while you’re exposed to political marketing like, Kamala Harris doing a happy and smiley scripted bit where she tells children if they’re “authentic” they will succeed, not only does that not connect with the reality of people’s struggles but it’s a slap in the face to them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I don’t. What was there to be mad at Hilary about that made people want to vote for a child raping, tax fraud committing, racist crook?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I was working at this business owner’s home. Smart, genuine, kind guy in his mid-40s with a beautiful “nuclear” family. He said he was going to vote for Trump because his sister in law worked at one his properties and she spoke well of him. That was it. That’s how a seemingly respectable upstanding well-to-do member of the community chose the president of the United States. Or, at worst, that was the reason he felt compelled to tell others.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

People in the US don’t understand what political ideologies are and literally vote for someone based off of “I’d like to have a beer with that guy!”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

My in-laws voted for him twice. They are pro-life, and that’s all that matters to them. Otherwise they support progressive policies like single-payer healthcare. But when it comes to abortion, they will vote for a literal anti-Christ to make it illegal. Funny that they are Catholic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

People who say they are pro-life will vote for the most pro-death policies, it’s crazy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The cruelty is the point.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Its not funny. Its ludacris.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Your in-laws sound like uninformed rubes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They kind of are, no college education and they don’t take the time to self-educate. Their support for single payer healthcare is something that both me and my husband have been working on with them for a while. I don’t think they are completely lost - they never showed the kind of hate I’ve seen from other Trump supporters. So I’ll keep trying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

So they’re going to vote for the guy that had an abortion?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If murder was legal, and somebody who was known to have committed murder was running, and you were confident that person would make murder illegal, and you were convinced that their opponent (who may have never committed murder themselves) would actively encourage more murder, maybe even pay poor people to commit murder, which candidate would you vote for?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Trust me, we’ve tried to reason with them. It’s maddening because they are otherwise mostly reasonable people, just ignorant politically and scientifically.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

They’ll vote for him a third time. Believe me, folks. *accordion hands*

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

As a non-American I can’t understand how Bernie wasn’t voted in decades ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

DNC sabotage his campaigns

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If there’s anything the last few years taught the world, stupid people are far more numerous and far more stupid than we thought.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 463K

    Comments