From the conclusion:

The authoring agencies urge executives of software manufacturers to prioritize using MSLs [memory-safe languages] in their products and to demonstrate that commitment by writing and publishing memory safe roadmaps. The authoring agencies encourage software manufacturers to lead from the top by publicly naming a business executive who will personally drive the elimination of memory safety vulnerabilities from the product line.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
16 points

That’s reverse psychology. They know everyone will lose trust in Rust and go back to memory unsafe languages so they can hack our software again.

  • put my tin foil hat aside -
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That’s exactly what they think you’re thinking about what they think you thought they were thinking, I wouldn’t fall for it

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Found the NSA agent. Don’t trust what they tell you to not trust when you’re not trusting. That’s what they want you to want.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That’s true. So I use Rust but I don’t use Rust.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Rust

!rust@programming.dev

Create post

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

!performance@programming.dev

Credits
  • The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

Community stats

  • 491

    Monthly active users

  • 813

    Posts

  • 3.7K

    Comments