You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
76 points

I mean, can someone really call themselves a “devil’s advocate” if they’re really just arguing for their own position that just happens to be unpopular with the people around them? My understanding was that the term was supposed to mean something more like arguing for a position that one disagrees with, to ensure that the arguments against that position hold up and strengthen them.

permalink
report
reply
48 points

They won’t actually say it’s their position on issues unless they get enough support. It’s pretending to play devil’s advocate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

schrodingers advocate

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

It’s more like a pseudo-devil’s advocate. Someone who claims to just be arguing against a topic for the sake of making a point even though they don’t agree, but actually doesn’t agree with what you said.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Isn’t the term, “playing devil’s advocate”? Take out the ‘playing’ and all you have is a devils advocate.

permalink
report
parent
reply