Iâll go first. Mine is that I canât stand the Deadpool movies. They are self aware and self referential to an obnoxious degree. Itâs like being continually reminded that I am in a movie. I swear the success of that movie has directly lead to every blockbuster having to have a joke every 30 seconds
Youâve way over analysed it. Itâd be like pissing on Star Wars because the Force has no basis in science.
No, the problem is internal consistency, in Star Wars the force works the same way in all films. But imagine if on one movie someone was shown using the force to move objects, and on the next movie the same character was shown trying to reach for something important and failing and not using the force and when asked he replies âitâs not possible to move objects with the forceâ. Thatâs the problem here, internal consistency, on one movie itâs said it works one way, on the other itâs said it works differently. I love both movies, I just think T2 shitted on one of the main things from T1.
Except the prequels establish force powers that we never see again and so do the sequels. Like force super speed in the phantom menace.
Youâre right
And you know how they explained time travel not making sense in Doctor Who? They called it âwibbly wobbly, timey wimey stuffâ and hand waved all that shit away.
And thatâs fine, but if one Dr. Who explained time travel in detail, showing things that would be impossible, the next doctor shouldnât violate those rules, itâs about in-universe consistency.
Iâll go ahead and guess that you havenât seen much doctor who :)
Dr who has av lot of qualities, consistency is not one of them (and itâs OK)
No, the âSingle Time Lineâ bit is a basic feature of T1, part of what makes it great, that T2 simply throws away.